DISCLAIMER

Viewing or use of this blog or any contents or links contained herein by any person or entity within the confines of the states of Arizona and/or Tennessee is prohibited .

Violators of this policy agree to hold the owner of this blog, its contents and all links contained herein, harmless to any harm or offense taken or perceived.

Permission to use any content on this site is explicitly denied to Robert Farago, his family, his friends, his associates, his pets, and his employees and/or employer and/or their employees either in part or whole.

This blog is not Strunk and White compliant; read with all due caution, diligence and pity.

Due to ITAR regulations, Godless Foreigners™ are required to avert their eyes.

26 September 2010

On the advice of Roberta X

Roberta X says we should not debate the antis because that gives them practice debating, thus improving their debating skills.

Instead, she suggests we cut them off at the knees and ask Joe Huffman's "One Question."

"Can you demonstrate one time or place, throughout all history, where the average person was made safer by restricting access to handheld weapons?"


I will do so from now on.  Joe is also the originator of the "Jews in the Attic" test.

1 comment:

  1. I'm okay with antis having better debating skills. I'm okay with actual debate.

    I think our rights are worth that much. If we can't articulate our position in a real debate, then we haven't invested much time in learning about them.

    The other aspect is there are dozens of people who haven't decided or hadn't thought of the issues for every dedicated anti we debate.

    If we change 1 or even 2 of those people, then it is a net win for the pro-rights side.

    ReplyDelete

Try to remember you are a guest here when you comment. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention.