DISCLAIMER

No good can come of reading the contents of this blog.

Viewing or use of this blog or any contents or links contained herein by any person or entity within the confines of the states of Arizona and/or Tennessee is prohibited .

Violators of this policy agree to hold the owner of this blog, its contents and all links contained herein, harmless to any harm or offense taken or perceived.

Permission to use any content on this site is explicitly denied to Robert Farago, his family, his friends, his associates, his pets, and his employees and/or employer and/or their employees either in part or whole.

07 December 2012

Fired Off A Missive To ATF

Sebastian posted about it and encouraged us to write.  So I stole someone named J's comment and added some text of my own.  Walla!

 
With regards to the ATF Question of the month posted here:http://www.atf.gov/firearms/industry/
I completely disagree with the inclusion of any new language pertaining to the restriction of any type of ammunition commonly used for sporting purposes. The regulations in question are onerous enough as is.
The law in question was never intended to be applied to rifle ammunition that is adapted to "handgun" use later.
Further, said ammunition is not a problem in the real world with regards to officer safety; this is a purely speculative move on the presumption that someone, somewhere, someday MIGHT use such ammunition unlawfully.
Literally attempting to fix something that is not broken by breaking it. 
Signed,Angus McThag

Bet it has zero effect on what they do, but we have to try. 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Try to remember you are a guest here when you comment. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention.