http://www.guns.com/2014/10/04/ruger-sues-1022-component-maker-for-trademark-violation/
So mentioning what your aftermarket parts fit is now a violation of trademark?
What's next? Edelbrock sells an intake for your car?
Kidd has been reduced to saying .22 LR Rifle.
I should order some parts then complain that they don't fit my Remington 341. Kidd claims they make parts for "the .22LR" and my Remington certainly is a .22LR.
I objected to this line of trademarking when H&K sued a company for making a .22 that looked like an MP5.
Click here to submit $0.00 US for a lifetime subscription
Posts
Comments
No comments:
Post a Comment
You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.
Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.
If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.
If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.