Once, in another life, I was a dumbass tanker. A DAT.
I was primarily a 19K, an M1 Abrams tanker. A CDAT, because we were computerized.
My single enlistment with tanks makes me an expert on tanks compared to an unwashed civilian.
Gaming and doing research to achieve a greater sense of willing suspension of disbelief for Twilight: 2000 makes me better informed on tanks to a point.
My research goals have an end date. "What would be reasonably fielded by 1997 when the nukes started flying and Lima, Ohio becomes s self lighting parking lot?"
That means I didn't really keep up with all the latest developments.
One place that shows clearly is watching a vid of a loader in an M1A2.
My M1A1(HA) didn't have that little deflector aft of the breech to knock the case-stub into a catch box.
We didn't have that box either.
The stubs came out the back of the gun and hit the floor to burn our ankles.
I also didn't have to lower the deflector to start the loading process.
I understand WHY that deflector and the box are there. It's a grim story. 1AD at Graf was "vacuum loading." That's keep the next round in your lap to speed up your engagement. Everything is timed.
Round 1 was fired, round 2 thrown in the breech and round 3 taken from the rack.
Round 2 hadn't closed the breech, so the loader put round 3 on the floor to seat round 2.
The primer on the stub lit the combustible portion of the 120mm round and it started smouldering.
Loader and TC got out. TC went back in for the gunner when the round went off on the floor.
TC and Gunner dead. Driver severely injured. Loader fine, but in a LOT of trouble.
Because of when I entered service, I learned vacuum loading for the 105mm gun on the M60A3 and we used it a couple of times with the 105 on the M1(IP). It was a forbidden practice from day one, but it took a while for it to stop happening.
Faster engagements were awarded. I've got the Arcoms and AAMs to show for it.
As it turned out, I'm faster doing it right than the prohibited way. Sub 3-second with a 105 and just a whisper faster than 4-seconds with a 120 HEAT round, faster with sabot.
We prided ourselves on engagement times.
Why?
Because the Soviet autoloader was slower than we were. We could get off two rounds to their one consistently and that mean survival when there were COUGH COUGH COUGH more Soviet tanks than ours.
We learned to this standard out of pure pride of accomplishment and not from a real belief that we'd be needing the skills any time soon.
The one-sided engagements like 74 Easting are testimony to the skills of both sides.
Which brings us, in a round about way, to sending modern NATO armor to Ukraine.
First thing we have to remember is Ukraine actively remade their armed forces on the NATO model after losing Crimea.
They're learning to fight like we fight.
It's been questioned if the Ukrainians can learn the NATO tanks and I think it should be easy for them if they're already tankers.
Poland is doing it right now. Changing from Warsaw Pact doctrine and equipment to NATO.
Polish tankers have reported that everything about crewing an M1 is simpler and easier than the T-72.
That's important.
I think the big problem with sending NATO tanks is that a couple battalions worth isn't meaningful.
I'm confident that a crew trained to the same standards I met in 1988 can mete out a 5-1 kill ratio.
5:1 on the top of the line the Soviets would have thrown at us, not the T-62M we keep seeing in footage. Those things are meat for the grinder for the old APFSDSDU round I had, and the new rounds are better.
All of that assumes we're going to give them a chance and fight when the sun's out.
NATO armor owns the fucking night.