tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1406088964942152547.post6923810197071164830..comments2024-03-28T21:31:47.191-04:00Comments on The Abode of McThag: Two Is OneAngus McThaghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09295013525738248801noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1406088964942152547.post-726855902375251082017-02-23T13:20:34.559-05:002017-02-23T13:20:34.559-05:00You're not tricking me into remembering this i...You're not tricking me into remembering this information and ruining years of therapy.Angus McThaghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09295013525738248801noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1406088964942152547.post-85646769753386124872017-02-23T13:17:40.275-05:002017-02-23T13:17:40.275-05:00Wouldn't Banach-Tarski say one is two, not two...Wouldn't Banach-Tarski say one is two, not two is one? <br /><br />I think the simpler derivation is from Murphy, cf <a href="http://www.frontiernet.net/~wmooney1/Fixed_files/murphy.pdf" rel="nofollow">The Contributions of Edsel Murphy to the Understanding of the Behavior of Inanimate Objects</a> <br />SiGraybeardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00280583031339062059noreply@blogger.com