The SKS has a two-piece piston, the FAL is one piece.
The bolts differ a great deal in detail and you can see that while the principle is the same, the designs are not inspired by or derived from the same source.
Bolt and carrier in the locked position.
Bolt and carrier in the unlocked position.
Bolt all by itself.
In both cases the bolt hits the end of the barrel and the carrier shoves the rear of the bolt down into the locking shoulder. On the SKS the rear of the bolt has a ramp that acts on the rear of the protruding "hook" on the bolt. On the FAL the top-rear of the bolt carrier has the ramp that shoves on the top of the back-end of the bolt.
For unlocking, the SKS carrier grabs the "hook" with a rear facing ramp and pulls the rear of the bolt up. The FAL has a lug on either side of the rear of the bolt that are lifted by rails on the interior sides of the bolt-carrier.
Image from: http://www.gundigest.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/FN49-3.jpg |
Image from: http://www.gunpics.net/russian/svt40/svt4022.JPG |
The FAL and SAFN use separate surfaces for each operation.
Mind numbingly interesting, no?
The hook lug on the SKS actually more resembles the tilting bolt of the MP.44 than something derived from the SVT. Much like Comrade Simonov copied the bolt and adapted his SVT carrier and gas system to it.
Image from: http://www.gotavapen.se/gota/ak/stg/mp44_bolt.jpg |
On top of it all, Msr Saive and Comrade Simonov weren't in communication with one another, even indirectly. Their designs sprang from their own selves and weren't cribbed from the work of others except in the broadest strokes.
Well that was fucking awesome!
ReplyDeleteConsider me educated! I'll have to say stupid shit more often!
It was fun doing the research and finding the pictures. I thank you for knocking the first pebble down the mountain.
DeleteThat was a very enlightening post. Thank you very much.
ReplyDelete