08 March 2016

On That Science Funding

Remember back before the Big Tobacco lawsuit when any research that showed that smoking didn't instantly give you cancer and/or kill you dead right there it was invalid because the tobacco companies paid for it?

Yet research funded by government is somehow not biased in favor of government?

This is why I continually harp that The IPCC is The InterGOVERNMENTAL Panel on Climate Change.

It's why I notice that none of the so-called solutions to catastrophic anthropogenic global climate change are in any way inimical to government but surely are to individual freedom and liberty.
at

1 comment:

  1. Weer'd Beard09 March, 2016 15:51

    Because private corporations have no need for climatologists....hell I don't even know why we even bother with meteorologists, just roll a D-20, you have better odds on that being right for if you should pack an umbrella. Climate Models? There isn't a slack-jaw'd greenhorn drunk bookie in Vegas that will cover a bet against those guys.

    But hey, if the Climatologists make the studies read the way .gov wants them to read they suddenly go from Paupers to getting paid (almost) as much as Engineers!

    We all know people who have sacrificed their morals and scruples for money, why would they think scientists are beyond that?

    ReplyDelete

You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.

Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.

If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.

If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.