It's aged four years! It needs more time in the barrel, and there's hints that there's a great whiskey lurking under the harshness here.
26 April 2017
Rot Gut
It's not as bad as you'd expect from whiskey in a baggie.
It's aged four years! It needs more time in the barrel, and there's hints that there's a great whiskey lurking under the harshness here.
It's aged four years! It needs more time in the barrel, and there's hints that there's a great whiskey lurking under the harshness here.
4 comments:
You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.
Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.
If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.
If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.
Need to write a parody version of "Whisky in the Jar" called "Whisky in the Bag."
ReplyDeleteMetallica is recording their version: 'Whiskey in the Bag-o'
DeleteA relic of an alternate universe, where the US Army puts whiskey in it's combat rations the way the French used to do with wine.
ReplyDelete"It's not as bad as you'd expect from whiskey in a baggie." You realize that isn't much in the way of faint praise.
ReplyDeleteAnd, aged four years? They should sell fresh whiskey, not old! It should have an expiration date: best if used before 08/17.
I'm guessing you're old enough to get the reference.