I think that's the most impressive one of those "junk on the table" photos I've ever seen. I've been in stores with less inventory.
Clearly a very wide angle lens, and it still doesn't get everything. He could have two dozen lowers that we can't resolve because of the distance from the camera.
You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.
Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.
If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.
If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.
I think that's the most impressive one of those "junk on the table" photos I've ever seen. I've been in stores with less inventory.
ReplyDeleteClearly a very wide angle lens, and it still doesn't get everything. He could have two dozen lowers that we can't resolve because of the distance from the camera.
Like you say, probably mostly harmless.