Having a remote flash or off-set light source helps a lot, too. The more off-set the flash, the less direct flash-back you'll get.
I like Photo #3, not a lot of flash-back or whatever the photo-people call it. #2 and #5 of the Exposure-settings are pretty darned good, too. Auto-Focus surprisingly did a darned good job.
Smart man. Wish the Evidence Tech at my last job had the same determination you are showing. With her, it was "Oh, look, yet another overly flared picture of something plasticky or metallicky."
You are definitely improving your art by practicing and fiddling.
You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.
Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.
If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.
If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.
Having a remote flash or off-set light source helps a lot, too. The more off-set the flash, the less direct flash-back you'll get.
ReplyDeleteI like Photo #3, not a lot of flash-back or whatever the photo-people call it. #2 and #5 of the Exposure-settings are pretty darned good, too. Auto-Focus surprisingly did a darned good job.
My Canon SX20 IS has excellent auto-focus! It was a feature I demanded.
DeleteSmart man. Wish the Evidence Tech at my last job had the same determination you are showing. With her, it was "Oh, look, yet another overly flared picture of something plasticky or metallicky."
DeleteYou are definitely improving your art by practicing and fiddling.