27 March 2020

Living In The Future

It just hit me that ripping off 16 frames to get one so-so picture of a bat in flight is something that most people wouldn't have done back in the days of film.

First off, it's half a roll of film.

Second, only the pros had the motor drive to fire rapid fire like that.

Me?  It's only electrons and there's over 11k exposures on that 128gb card.

The battery will die long before I run out of storage.

That's kinda nifty.
at

2 comments:

  1. John in Philly27 March, 2020 07:45

    Way back when we were taking photos of dinosaurs, we thought that using a 36 exposure roll of 35 mm film was about as good as it could get for the amateur photographer.

    I bought my first digital camera and never looked back.

    ReplyDelete
  2. SiGraybeard27 March, 2020 09:48

    That's the best part of digital cameras. The film and processing is cheaper than dirt.

    ReplyDelete

You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.

Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.

If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.

If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.