Survey Says: Americans Are Dumber Than a Bag of Rocks A survey of Americans conducted by YouGov, an international research, data, and analytics group headquartered in London for America, tells me that way too many Americans are dumber than a bag of rocks, or dumber than Joe Biden, depending on your preferred metaphor. Perception is formed by observation. With most people, if they “see” it, they believe it. But perception is not reality. Modern Americans “see” something on TV or the internet, and believe that whatever “that” might be is a reflection of reality, because they generally spend too much time in front of a screen.
30 March 2022
Quoted For Truth
Perception and reality rarely align.
Take
TV commercials. If aliens tapped into TV feeds, they’d be left with the
perception that the majority, or a significant minority, of couples are
interracial. They aren’t. The current amount is about 10 percent, but
adverts selling products from cars to deodorant would leave you with a
perception that maybe 60 percent of couples are interracial.
Since
2019, the shift in the color of actors in ads went from mostly white to
mostly Black. Companies were reminded of the overrepresentation of
whites in commercials, and they answered that call with a vast
overcompensation. Black people comprise about 13 percent of the
population, but TV ads overpopulate commercials with Black actors to the
point that commercials are likely employing more black actors than any
other demographic (demo). What do American think is the percentage of
Blacks in America? Forty-one percent.
Some
reading this will cry “white fragility!” “Racist!.” But the perception
of Blacks of their demographic size blows that up. Blacks thought their
demo was 52 percent of the population. Maybe they watch more TV
commercials? Nope. Most Americans watch too much TV.
From the study:
…[n]on-Black Americans estimate the proportion is roughly 39%,
closer to the real figure of 12%. First-generation immigrants we
surveyed estimate that first-generation immigrants account for 40% of
U.S. adults, while non-immigrants guess it is around 31%, closer to the
actual figure of 14%.
I
don’t watch TV for much beyond research and sports – but my wife
watches for entertainment. I’ve noticed a couple of things, when my wife
wants me to ‘join’ her. There are a lot more gay characters in movies
and on TV shows than statistics tell us, and a lot more Muslims than the
statistics support. How do I know the characters are gay? Because the
plotlines dictate, indeed mandate, that the viewer be told.
What
about Muslims? Headscarves. Well, that’s bigoted – lots of women wear
scarves. Nope. I’ve asked my wife. “Is that character Muslim”? The
answer is always: Yes. In reality, the Muslim population in the US is
less than one percent. What do Americans think, or perceive to be the
percentage? Twenty-seven percent.
My
wife was watching a show Monday night. It was a crime drama, and a
character was transgender – I think. I don’t know what the person was,
but they were dressed like a drag queen
But
I’m not a biologist. I didn’t have to ask, because shows make it
abundantly clear. What do Americans think is the percentage of
transgenders? In reality, it’s well under one percent. Americans pegged
the number at 21 percent.
Those
broad numbers are bad enough, but there are plenty of dummies to go
around. Why are Americans so bad at adjusting their perceptions? A hint
is: not the survey. The survey states that Americans think that 77
percent have read a book in the past year. The survey claims the number
is 50 percent. I think it’s lower, because I have a preconception that
most people are not terribly well-informed or curious.
The author tries to explain:
When a person’s lived experience suggests an extreme value — such as
a small proportion of people who are Jewish or a large proportion of
people who are Christian — they often assume, reasonably, that their
experiences are biased. In response, they adjust their prior estimate of
a group’s size accordingly by shifting it closer to what they perceive
to be the mean group size (that is, 50%). This can facilitate
misestimation (sic) in surveys, such as ours, which don’t require people
to make tradeoffs by constraining the sum of group proportions within a
certain category to 100%.
In common-speak, most people aren’t bright, and they will take wild stabs at reality based on perception, rounding the mean.
We
are not a smart people, unfortunately — and apparently, our president
matches that label. In this case, perception matches reality.
-- Jim Thompson
Copyright ©2022 RedStatedotcom
2 comments:
You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.
Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.
If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.
If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.
I believe in the 70's marking analysis said people were most likely to respond to advertisement which featured people of the same race or ethnic groups as themselves. I don't think that data has changed.
ReplyDeleteThe difference now is driven by politics especially the Woke and Me Too group think. The blended family group ads get copied from corporation to corporation as trendy and politically correct. If you believed the demographics from commercials 20-30% of all couples in the US are gay or lesbian. There is no data to support that.
Also note the head of Disney entertainment just announce she want 50% of all new characters to be minority or LGBTQIA.
I've noticed that in the multi-racial-couple commercials and "entertainment," it's almost always a black guy with a white woman. My own kind (white guy with Asian woman) is much less common.
ReplyDelete