You know, the more I think about it, it is confusing. "The Hobbit" should have been film 1, then TLOTR(s).
Just wish "The Hobbit" trinary wasn't so darned... booooooring. Could have been smoothed down to 2 movies of bloated length rather than three. And no need to add too many other storylines, start with just what's in the book.
There is a cut of the Hobbit movies called the Tolkien edit that removes most of the extraneous bits (cuts it down to about 4 hours). There are many other fan cuts of the hobbit movies if that one doesn't strike your fancy.
You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.
Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.
If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.
If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.
You know, the more I think about it, it is confusing. "The Hobbit" should have been film 1, then TLOTR(s).
ReplyDeleteJust wish "The Hobbit" trinary wasn't so darned... booooooring. Could have been smoothed down to 2 movies of bloated length rather than three. And no need to add too many other storylines, start with just what's in the book.
Sigh.
There is a cut of the Hobbit movies called the Tolkien edit that removes most of the extraneous bits (cuts it down to about 4 hours). There are many other fan cuts of the hobbit movies if that one doesn't strike your fancy.
ReplyDelete