Years ago I spoke with a Savage company man and asked about the 99 which had just been dropped. He advised that there was just no way it could be economically produced. Just too much complex machining and fitting.
I have two Savages I like. A 111 in .30-06 Spr and a Mark II in .22 LR. Both excellent shooters. If I needed another commercial bolt action Savage would be at the top of my short list. -swj
You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.
Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.
If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.
If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.
Years ago I spoke with a Savage company man and asked about the 99 which had just been dropped. He advised that there was just no way it could be economically produced. Just too much complex machining and fitting.
ReplyDeleteWhat's economical for a starving, small Savage, might be doable for S&W...
DeleteIt *IS* a very complex design, but a 99 2.0 that's more rationalized could be possible.
I have two Savages I like. A 111 in .30-06 Spr and a Mark II in .22 LR. Both excellent shooters. If I needed another commercial bolt action Savage would be at the top of my short list.
ReplyDelete-swj