14 June 2019

And They Know It Too

JKB at Miguel's posts.

When your gun free victim zone contains the disclaimer;

ALTHOUGH WEAPONS ARE BANNED FROM THIS MUNICIPAL FACILITY, THE CITY OF RACINE CANNOT ENSURE THE PROTECTION OF VISITORS OR ITS EMPLOYEES FROM INDIVIDUALS WHO UNLAWFULLY ENTER WITH WEAPONS AND DOES NOT OFFER PROTECTION AGAINST THE ACTIONS OF VIOLATORS.

And that disclaimer is present because the liability insurance carrier for the gun free victim zone mandates it...

It confirms everything we've been saying about the things for, what, decades now?

Gun Free Zone should be in the thesaurus under Extremely Hazardous Area.

You cannot protect yourself, it is forbidden.

They will not protect you either.

Even worse, they're dumping the responsibility for protecting yourself back on you.  Which, as mentioned, you're not allowed to do...
at

3 comments:

  1. MrGarabaldi14 June, 2019 20:31

    Hey Angus;

    Yep Bottom feeding lawyers, keeps them from being libel

    ReplyDelete
  2. SiGraybeard15 June, 2019 13:45

    I wonder how that would play out in court? You sue the city for that contradiction of demanding you defend yourself while outlawing your ability to defend yourself.

    I'm obviously not a lawyer, but it seems that would end up being a very potent precedent.

    ReplyDelete
  3. SofwareJanitor17 June, 2019 11:11

    I try to avoid Designated Victim Areas.

    ReplyDelete

You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.

Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.

If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.

If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.