When your gun free victim zone contains the disclaimer;
ALTHOUGH WEAPONS ARE BANNED FROM THIS MUNICIPAL FACILITY, THE CITY OF RACINE CANNOT ENSURE THE PROTECTION OF VISITORS OR ITS EMPLOYEES FROM INDIVIDUALS WHO UNLAWFULLY ENTER WITH WEAPONS AND DOES NOT OFFER PROTECTION AGAINST THE ACTIONS OF VIOLATORS.
And that disclaimer is present because the liability insurance carrier for the gun free victim zone mandates it...
It confirms everything we've been saying about the things for, what, decades now?
Gun Free Zone should be in the thesaurus under Extremely Hazardous Area.
You cannot protect yourself, it is forbidden.
They will not protect you either.
Even worse, they're dumping the responsibility for protecting yourself back on you. Which, as mentioned, you're not allowed to do...
Hey Angus;
ReplyDeleteYep Bottom feeding lawyers, keeps them from being libel
I wonder how that would play out in court? You sue the city for that contradiction of demanding you defend yourself while outlawing your ability to defend yourself.
ReplyDeleteI'm obviously not a lawyer, but it seems that would end up being a very potent precedent.
I try to avoid Designated Victim Areas.
ReplyDelete