If you're like me and Libertarian adjacent, this article is well worth your time.
It's long. It might set you off a bit.
Gut it out.
It codifies why the hair on the back of my neck rises when either of the Pauls spoke. It identifies the wrongness.
If you're like me and Libertarian adjacent, this article is well worth your time.
It's long. It might set you off a bit.
Gut it out.
It codifies why the hair on the back of my neck rises when either of the Pauls spoke. It identifies the wrongness.
You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.
Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.
If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.
If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.
One reason I work with the GOP is because the LP is inherently doomed to be a tiny third party. Our system, like it or not (and I don't) is rigged for two parties only. Also, insisting on absolute doctrinal purity is a recipe for defeat. Getting better is going to be a long hard one-step-at-a-time slog.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7tWHJfhiyo&list=PLej2SlXPEd37YwwEY7mm0WyZ8cfB1TxXa&index=1
DeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
DeleteMr. Gambini, that is a lucid, intelligent, well thought-out objection.
DeleteAnd if you had just signed your work, it would have been published.
But I see that you, like many libertardians, can't read. Or follow rules that you feel that you're too good to bother obeying.