Chili has beans. By their own admission, even Texans put beans in their chili.
See this map.
Not seen in the screen shot are two Mexican respondents whom also use beans.
Judging by the no-bean distribution in Texas and the political make-up of those areas. Liberals don't put beans in chili.
We kind of always knew, didn't we?
23 October 2016
3 comments:
You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.
Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.
If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.
If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Saw a recipe for Chili without beans, and it sucked.
ReplyDeleteWithout beans is like Well Done Steak, just don't bother.
If it has beans, it's Chili soup... :-)
ReplyDeleteLiberal! ;)
DeleteWithout meat or beans you have sauce. An ingredient.
New England, Canada and liberal infested cities in Texas appear to be the only places where this sauce is considered actual completed chili. How odd.