One of the reasons that statistics is listed after "damn lies" is that it's not very good a predicting specific outcomes.
The Monty Hall problem is famous.
Given three choices, you pick one. One of the choices you did not select will be revealed to not contain the prize. Should you change your selection to the remaining box or stick with your initial choice?
Statistics says change your selection.
Mythbusters even did an experiment that proved you win more often if you change.
The thing is, this doesn't predict if any given iteration of the game is a winner or not.
Example. Prize is in box A. Contestant choses box A. Box C is shown to not have a prize in it. Changing your selection in that case is a loss!
This is also why the plural of anecdote is not data.
Even though I have a better chance of winning by changing my choice that doesn't mean I am guaranteed to win by changing my choice.
Another example is from crime statistics.
A disproportionate number of crimes are committed by black people. That statistic does not provide an accurate predictor that a specific black person is about to commit a crime.
Most murders in the USA are committed with a firearm. That statistic is not an accurate predictor that any specific firearm will be used to murder someone. The records that are kept only generally predict what kind of firearm will be used.
This part of statistics is why I get the RCB when I pay my car insurance. I am a man, I have a Corvette, I am under 65. Statistically speaking I speed, drive recklessly and have accidents.
I've gotten speeding out of my system. Track days do that. I've gotten reckless out of my system. Being DQ'd for being reckless on the track and losing the rather spendy entry fee really mellows you, besides, when you slow the heck down you have less NEED to be reckless.
I have not had an accident where I was at fault since REFORGER 1988. In my defense, running over the parked car was preferable to running over the child who ran out in front of the tank. Darwin was sleeping that day.
Yet my insurance rates are based on the behavior of the worst of others not on what I do.
I am so very sick of being judged by the behavior of others.
Click here to submit $0.00 US for a lifetime subscription
Posts
All Comments
30 April 2013
Straw Buy
There's some confusion down at the gun shops about what a straw buy is.
It's the ATF who's got them confused.
An actual straw purchase is where a person whom is legally allowed to own a firearm purchases one with the sole intent of giving or selling it to someone who is forbidden to own it. This includes the prohibited person having the non-prohibited make a purchase for them.
ATF has got gun shops believing that any purchase made with the intent of giving or selling it to someone else is a straw purchase, and therefore illegal. They're just plain wrong. They're so wrong the notice on the 4473 contradicts them!
Important Notice 1:
Did you see that? If you're buying it as a gift, it's A-OK. Now, try buying a gun and telling the person behind the counter you're giving the gun to the person standing next to you.
There have been times where me or my friends have been well short on funds when a once-in-a-blue-moon deal surfaces. None of us are prohibited people and all but two of use are CCW holders. How does person A, who doesn't want the gun buy it for person B to pay them back?
The obvious method is for person A to loan person B the cash. That cash then magically becomes person B's "own money" and the sale proceeds.
Try handing person B the money in a gun shop in front of the counter clerk.
It's semantics. And because it is, it's bullshit.
The intent of and the wording of the law is that prohibited people aren't allowed to purchase or possess firearms. That's simple. ATF has made it complicated by trying to regulate how such a person my come into possession of a firearm. Actually, they're regulating the precise method that non-prohibited people come into possession and by exclusion are preventing prohibited folks from acquiring guns.
It's the ATF who's got them confused.
An actual straw purchase is where a person whom is legally allowed to own a firearm purchases one with the sole intent of giving or selling it to someone who is forbidden to own it. This includes the prohibited person having the non-prohibited make a purchase for them.
ATF has got gun shops believing that any purchase made with the intent of giving or selling it to someone else is a straw purchase, and therefore illegal. They're just plain wrong. They're so wrong the notice on the 4473 contradicts them!
Question 12a is: "Are you the actual buyer of the firearm(s) listed on this form? Warning: You are not the actual buyer if you are acquiring the firearm(s) on behalf of another person. If you are not the actual buyer, the dealer cannot transfer the firearm(s) to you. (See Important Notice 1 for actual buyer definition and examples.)"
Important Notice 1:
For purposes of this form, you are the actual buyer if you are purchasing the firearm for yourself or otherwise acquiring the firearm for yourself (for example, redeeming the firearm from pawn/retrieving it from consignment).You are also the actual buyer if you are acquiring the firearm as a legitimate gift for a third party. ACTUAL BUYER EXAMPLES: Mr. Smith asks Mr. Jones to purchase a firearm for Mr. Smith. Mr. Smith gives Mr. Jones the money for the firearm. Mr. Jones is NOT the actual buyer of the firearm and must answer “no “ to question 12a. The licensee may not transfer the firearm to Mr. Jones. However, if Mr. Brown goes to buy a firearm with his own money to give to Mr. Black as a present, Mr. Brown is the actual buyer of the firearm and should answer “yes” to question 12a.
Did you see that? If you're buying it as a gift, it's A-OK. Now, try buying a gun and telling the person behind the counter you're giving the gun to the person standing next to you.
There have been times where me or my friends have been well short on funds when a once-in-a-blue-moon deal surfaces. None of us are prohibited people and all but two of use are CCW holders. How does person A, who doesn't want the gun buy it for person B to pay them back?
The obvious method is for person A to loan person B the cash. That cash then magically becomes person B's "own money" and the sale proceeds.
Try handing person B the money in a gun shop in front of the counter clerk.
It's semantics. And because it is, it's bullshit.
The intent of and the wording of the law is that prohibited people aren't allowed to purchase or possess firearms. That's simple. ATF has made it complicated by trying to regulate how such a person my come into possession of a firearm. Actually, they're regulating the precise method that non-prohibited people come into possession and by exclusion are preventing prohibited folks from acquiring guns.
Break Glass
I want to open a gun shop.
On the wall will be a glass case with the cheapest POS AR I can find.
It will be priced: $10,000.00.
It will be captioned: When it happens, you'll know.
On the wall will be a glass case with the cheapest POS AR I can find.
It will be priced: $10,000.00.
It will be captioned: When it happens, you'll know.
28 April 2013
Why Did You Think They Were Called That?
Friend who will remain nameless: What are you doing?
Me: Cutting up potatoes.
FWWRN: Why?
Me: To make mashed potatoes.
FWWRN: You can make mashed potatoes with POTATOES?
Me: Which part of mashed POTATOES is slipping past you?
Me: Cutting up potatoes.
FWWRN: Why?
Me: To make mashed potatoes.
FWWRN: You can make mashed potatoes with POTATOES?
Me: Which part of mashed POTATOES is slipping past you?
Color Coded
Because 25-round 6.8x43mm magazines are externally identical to the 30-round 5.56x45mm ones; but not interchangeable, you have to come up with a fast, easy way to tell them apart.
So I went with putting colored electrical tape around the magazine base; blue electrical tape. It gives both a visual and tactile clue about what magazine you are using.
Now that Tabitha is dressed in purple, I've got some violet electrical tape for my magazines.
I wish I knew how to set my camera to consistently capture the color of the furniture. The violet of the tape, in this photo, is how the handguards look in person. I don't know why the camera makes them blue!
Edit:
I might not know how to make the camera do what I want, but I can make Photoshop! Here's the same picture as above with the hue adjusted to look right.
So I went with putting colored electrical tape around the magazine base; blue electrical tape. It gives both a visual and tactile clue about what magazine you are using.
Now that Tabitha is dressed in purple, I've got some violet electrical tape for my magazines.
I wish I knew how to set my camera to consistently capture the color of the furniture. The violet of the tape, in this photo, is how the handguards look in person. I don't know why the camera makes them blue!
Edit:
I might not know how to make the camera do what I want, but I can make Photoshop! Here's the same picture as above with the hue adjusted to look right.
Moments
At present I really want a dish from a city I no longer live in from a restaurant which no longer exists.
House of Chen's kung-pao chicken sounds delightful.
House of Chen's kung-pao chicken sounds delightful.
27 April 2013
You're Not Fooling Anyone
"I'll ask my wife/girlfriend/significant other..." means no.
You know it means no.
I know it means no.
Let's just stop insulting each other's intelligence and say no.
You know it means no.
I know it means no.
Let's just stop insulting each other's intelligence and say no.
Wattah!
I've made a big change to my next Traveller game.
The huge tanks of hydrogen will be replaced with water.
The main reason is that it's not 1977 any more.
In 1977 it likely seemed very reasonable to the writers at GDW to use hydrogen for the ship's fuel as it appeared to be the only readily accessible fusion fuel source.
This was before the Kuiper Belt was theorized, let alone discovered or widely known.
This was before the past 36 years of research into fusion.
Water is plentiful in the solar system, and mostly more accessible than raw hydrogen. You have to thaw it though.
Besides electrolysis, applying ridiculous levels of heat will separate oxygen and hydrogen in water. That's something a fusion reactor has to spare. Then it's a few protium reactions, a couple of lithium 6 injections and whammo! Tritium fusion breeding He3 fusion. Consume the oxygen as a secondary burn or collect it to use as a coolant, your choice.
In GURPS terms the Traveller power plant consumes an insane amount of fuel, but I am OK with that since the reactionless drives are insanely violating physics; and that's pretty much the entire consumption from a power plant in the Traveller canon. The extra mass from using the same volume of water is side stepped by the drives apparently moving a volume and not applying thrust to a mass.
For years I grappled with a good game reason to get the players to purchase fuel from the star port instead of harvesting it from the local gas giant and I think I've gotten it licked; and it took changing the fuel to water to get there.
The Kuiper Belt is out there a ways, so to harvest water from the ice puts you an inconvenient distance from the main system. Yes, you can get free water, but you lose the travel time. If you're a merchant ship you only make money on delivery, so anything that spreads the paydays out is costing you. Time is literally money to any freight hauler. This gives the players an incentive to purchase fuel from the port, as long as it's cheaper than losing a week to travel.
What could be cheaper than water?
Using water also allows me to retain the refining step from canon. Industrial water is far more pure than tap water or "wild" water. All sorts of impurities you don't want in your fusion bottle.
You lose the drama of the dive into a gas giant for fuel, but I've yet to have a player be happy about the idea of their character's lives depending on a single piloting roll.
The huge tanks of hydrogen will be replaced with water.
The main reason is that it's not 1977 any more.
In 1977 it likely seemed very reasonable to the writers at GDW to use hydrogen for the ship's fuel as it appeared to be the only readily accessible fusion fuel source.
This was before the Kuiper Belt was theorized, let alone discovered or widely known.
This was before the past 36 years of research into fusion.
Water is plentiful in the solar system, and mostly more accessible than raw hydrogen. You have to thaw it though.
Besides electrolysis, applying ridiculous levels of heat will separate oxygen and hydrogen in water. That's something a fusion reactor has to spare. Then it's a few protium reactions, a couple of lithium 6 injections and whammo! Tritium fusion breeding He3 fusion. Consume the oxygen as a secondary burn or collect it to use as a coolant, your choice.
In GURPS terms the Traveller power plant consumes an insane amount of fuel, but I am OK with that since the reactionless drives are insanely violating physics; and that's pretty much the entire consumption from a power plant in the Traveller canon. The extra mass from using the same volume of water is side stepped by the drives apparently moving a volume and not applying thrust to a mass.
For years I grappled with a good game reason to get the players to purchase fuel from the star port instead of harvesting it from the local gas giant and I think I've gotten it licked; and it took changing the fuel to water to get there.
The Kuiper Belt is out there a ways, so to harvest water from the ice puts you an inconvenient distance from the main system. Yes, you can get free water, but you lose the travel time. If you're a merchant ship you only make money on delivery, so anything that spreads the paydays out is costing you. Time is literally money to any freight hauler. This gives the players an incentive to purchase fuel from the port, as long as it's cheaper than losing a week to travel.
What could be cheaper than water?
Using water also allows me to retain the refining step from canon. Industrial water is far more pure than tap water or "wild" water. All sorts of impurities you don't want in your fusion bottle.
You lose the drama of the dive into a gas giant for fuel, but I've yet to have a player be happy about the idea of their character's lives depending on a single piloting roll.
26 April 2013
Stellar Cartography
Traveller's maps are two dimensional.
The universe is, by and large, three dimensional.
It only started bugging me when I bought GDW's 2300 AD. That game had an excellent map describing a sphere some 50 light years in diameter around Sol.
So I embarked on a quest to fix the maps.
The problem is much of the existing material depends on the topography from the 2D maps.
I was on the S-Bahn in Stuttgart when a solution hit me. The Traveller maps were just like the maps of the train line. They didn't necessarily correspond to the real position of things, just how the train reached them.
That settled it with me for a while, but there's a canon device where the Imperium is using a dispersed array of telescopes to look very long distances.
Dammit, I still need a 3D explanation.
Then it hit me.
Take the existing "subway map" and print it all on one gigantic sheet of paper.
Crumple that sheet into a big wad.
Jumpspace has to follow the paper, three space doesn't.
Most places on the 2D map are still very close in this 3D representation, and if one were to actually map it out, you could figure out the real distances of things.
Even with the miraculous maneuver drives from Traveller, a slower than light trip around a fold in the map will still take far longer than the multiple jumps will by following the paper.
The only real wrinkle is that in some places beaming a message will take less time than sending it by X-Boat.
No solution is perfect, but at least this is playable.
The universe is, by and large, three dimensional.
It only started bugging me when I bought GDW's 2300 AD. That game had an excellent map describing a sphere some 50 light years in diameter around Sol.
So I embarked on a quest to fix the maps.
The problem is much of the existing material depends on the topography from the 2D maps.
I was on the S-Bahn in Stuttgart when a solution hit me. The Traveller maps were just like the maps of the train line. They didn't necessarily correspond to the real position of things, just how the train reached them.
That settled it with me for a while, but there's a canon device where the Imperium is using a dispersed array of telescopes to look very long distances.
Dammit, I still need a 3D explanation.
Then it hit me.
Take the existing "subway map" and print it all on one gigantic sheet of paper.
Crumple that sheet into a big wad.
Jumpspace has to follow the paper, three space doesn't.
Most places on the 2D map are still very close in this 3D representation, and if one were to actually map it out, you could figure out the real distances of things.
Even with the miraculous maneuver drives from Traveller, a slower than light trip around a fold in the map will still take far longer than the multiple jumps will by following the paper.
The only real wrinkle is that in some places beaming a message will take less time than sending it by X-Boat.
No solution is perfect, but at least this is playable.
Dammit!
I've become "THAT GUY".
I didn't and don't want to be HIM.
I'll be offline while I grapple with what to do about it.
I didn't and don't want to be HIM.
I'll be offline while I grapple with what to do about it.
25 April 2013
Marketplace Fairness Act
Time to dust off the moldy Supreme Court rulings...
In the days of yore, the Supreme Court held that interstate tariffs are unconstitutional because such is the bailiwick of the Feds not the states.
The Marketplace Fairness Act will impose the sales taxes of the customer's location upon the seller regardless of their location. In effect a federal interstate tariff.
The Supreme Court has also ruled that the law must treat all equally. This is why you can live like a prince on the dole in central Montana and can't buy a Happy Meal with it in NYFC.
The MFA should get nuked just as soon as someone figures out how to get standing.
The problem is the bloody costs while that case slowly works its way up the chain, assuming they can get the Justices to grant certori.
There are already notices on places like Gunbroker, "No Sales to California". Do we want to see that start happening for places like Ebay or Amazon? There are already, "add 4% for payment using Credit Card or PayPal." Do you think a notice saying, "add 25% for sales to California," will increase sales?
It's not intended to increase sales. It's intended as a barrier to entry to new businesses and to prevent businesses smaller than a particular size from getting large enough to be competitive with the established players. Players who are large enough that they have a staff that deals with figuring out sales taxes. Large enough that the staff who's going to be figuring this out have just acquired a new duty rather than hiring someone new to do it. In other words, it's not going to cost Amazon anything consequential to comply with the MFA, but it would have a large impact on, say, an auto salvage yard.
Call your congress critter. Tell them that this is most definitely unfair and even worse will have a deleterious effect on an already weak economy. Tell them that if they are having trouble with finding enough money to pay for programs then perhaps they can try something new, like reducing spending. Ask them how they know that won't work, because they damn sure have never tried it.
In the days of yore, the Supreme Court held that interstate tariffs are unconstitutional because such is the bailiwick of the Feds not the states.
The Marketplace Fairness Act will impose the sales taxes of the customer's location upon the seller regardless of their location. In effect a federal interstate tariff.
The Supreme Court has also ruled that the law must treat all equally. This is why you can live like a prince on the dole in central Montana and can't buy a Happy Meal with it in NYFC.
The MFA should get nuked just as soon as someone figures out how to get standing.
The problem is the bloody costs while that case slowly works its way up the chain, assuming they can get the Justices to grant certori.
There are already notices on places like Gunbroker, "No Sales to California". Do we want to see that start happening for places like Ebay or Amazon? There are already, "add 4% for payment using Credit Card or PayPal." Do you think a notice saying, "add 25% for sales to California," will increase sales?
It's not intended to increase sales. It's intended as a barrier to entry to new businesses and to prevent businesses smaller than a particular size from getting large enough to be competitive with the established players. Players who are large enough that they have a staff that deals with figuring out sales taxes. Large enough that the staff who's going to be figuring this out have just acquired a new duty rather than hiring someone new to do it. In other words, it's not going to cost Amazon anything consequential to comply with the MFA, but it would have a large impact on, say, an auto salvage yard.
Call your congress critter. Tell them that this is most definitely unfair and even worse will have a deleterious effect on an already weak economy. Tell them that if they are having trouble with finding enough money to pay for programs then perhaps they can try something new, like reducing spending. Ask them how they know that won't work, because they damn sure have never tried it.
An Ãœberpost Well Worth Your Time
Kevin has fired another suborbital out of the park.
Read the entire thing and notice all the links.
This is your one stop shop for rebutting just about any proponent of gun-control.
Yes, it's a giant wall of text, but it's not really all that long.
Read the entire thing and notice all the links.
This is your one stop shop for rebutting just about any proponent of gun-control.
Yes, it's a giant wall of text, but it's not really all that long.
Pay Attention
When you spend your money on entertainment be sure you know where your dollar is going.
Like checking to see if the author of the story is a card carrying socialist? Do you really want to pay for that? Participate in creating a RICH socialist hypocrite?
I don't either.
Yes, that means passing on some very entertaining material.
It also means that you're not funding the kind of folks who are happily trying to make it impossible to live your life.
Hollywood, in fact, has gotten so bad that stealing their content might very well be the moral choice.
Update:
Sean via a hater... some other places to avoid spending your money because they don't like that you have guns.
Like checking to see if the author of the story is a card carrying socialist? Do you really want to pay for that? Participate in creating a RICH socialist hypocrite?
I don't either.
Yes, that means passing on some very entertaining material.
It also means that you're not funding the kind of folks who are happily trying to make it impossible to live your life.
Hollywood, in fact, has gotten so bad that stealing their content might very well be the moral choice.
Update:
Sean via a hater... some other places to avoid spending your money because they don't like that you have guns.
Mixed Metaphor
Just saw the new Total Recall.
It's like MC Esher meets Blade Runner in the Matrix, with a guest appearance of I Robot.
It's like MC Esher meets Blade Runner in the Matrix, with a guest appearance of I Robot.
24 April 2013
Experiment
I have a take-home project for y'all.
For a week, when someone is rude to you, be rude right back at them.
When someone is clueless and slams into you, don't say "excuse me", say "watch where you're going."
Wait for the other party to cross the politeness Rubicon, but once crossed give 'em Hell.
I think you're going to be shocked.
I've been doing this experiment for several months. Most people actually seem to recognize they're being something of an ass and apologize when confronted. There's a small fraction whose lives seem to depend on being jerks and taking advantage of our ingrained politeness.
I started this because of a bit of game theory I stumbled upon. What have I to gain from being unfailingly polite to people who are being rude either through accident or design?
Turns out the only gain from being nice to people who are being rude is there's no confrontation about it. There's apparently lots to gain from being rude though and by not confronting the transgressor you are allowing them that gain at your expense.
For a week, when someone is rude to you, be rude right back at them.
When someone is clueless and slams into you, don't say "excuse me", say "watch where you're going."
Wait for the other party to cross the politeness Rubicon, but once crossed give 'em Hell.
I think you're going to be shocked.
I've been doing this experiment for several months. Most people actually seem to recognize they're being something of an ass and apologize when confronted. There's a small fraction whose lives seem to depend on being jerks and taking advantage of our ingrained politeness.
I started this because of a bit of game theory I stumbled upon. What have I to gain from being unfailingly polite to people who are being rude either through accident or design?
Turns out the only gain from being nice to people who are being rude is there's no confrontation about it. There's apparently lots to gain from being rude though and by not confronting the transgressor you are allowing them that gain at your expense.
23 April 2013
Manhood
You know: a heterosexual man who owns a kilt, watches My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic and owns these guns:
Is someone who is secure enough in their manhood that they just aren't going to be bothered when you attempt insults along those lines.
Is someone who is secure enough in their manhood that they just aren't going to be bothered when you attempt insults along those lines.
I Am A Bad Person
When you almost ram into me charging out of the check out lane and don't say excuse me...
When you stand in doorway of the store, blocking the exit...
When you careen around the parking lot going just fast enough to stay in front of my limping...
When you smash into my cart when I'm trying to get around you...
You are going to be called a bitch.
You were being rude on purpose, I saw your face, you don't get to be indignant that someone called you on it.
You might want to find a new repertoire of insults. I have to have a modicum of respect for the person slinging them to be insulted by them.
Especially insults to my manliness.
That particular bit of esteem is unassailable. I know the exact dimensions of my manhood, both physical and emotional and discovered that I am comfortable with them.
My penis is small? Why would that matter to you? After being such a bitch you're not going to get any use from it.
No woman would want me? Want my wife's number? She hates rude harridans too.
Harridan? Look it up.
Lady, the world smells better if you take your head out of your ass.
All this is transpiring while I am loading my groceries in my trunk. I finished while she was still screaming at me and drove away giving her a very wide berth.
She followed me part of the way home flipping me off.
She irritated me for a few minutes, I appear to have ruined her entire day.
Civility is reserved for when both parties are participating.
When you stand in doorway of the store, blocking the exit...
When you careen around the parking lot going just fast enough to stay in front of my limping...
When you smash into my cart when I'm trying to get around you...
You are going to be called a bitch.
You were being rude on purpose, I saw your face, you don't get to be indignant that someone called you on it.
You might want to find a new repertoire of insults. I have to have a modicum of respect for the person slinging them to be insulted by them.
Especially insults to my manliness.
That particular bit of esteem is unassailable. I know the exact dimensions of my manhood, both physical and emotional and discovered that I am comfortable with them.
My penis is small? Why would that matter to you? After being such a bitch you're not going to get any use from it.
No woman would want me? Want my wife's number? She hates rude harridans too.
Harridan? Look it up.
Lady, the world smells better if you take your head out of your ass.
All this is transpiring while I am loading my groceries in my trunk. I finished while she was still screaming at me and drove away giving her a very wide berth.
She followed me part of the way home flipping me off.
She irritated me for a few minutes, I appear to have ruined her entire day.
Civility is reserved for when both parties are participating.
22 April 2013
Earth Day
I celebrated Earth Day by driving The Boy to his Special Olympics training session in the Biscayne.
The Biscayne gets about 14 mpg in town.
I let it sit and idle for the hour or so The Boy was in the pool while I read a book.
Back at home the AC was set to 70, both tube TV's were running and I had the big computer crunching on rendering a complex 3D model.
Every light was on as well.
The Biscayne gets about 14 mpg in town.
I let it sit and idle for the hour or so The Boy was in the pool while I read a book.
Back at home the AC was set to 70, both tube TV's were running and I had the big computer crunching on rendering a complex 3D model.
Every light was on as well.
Trigger Pull
Marv bought a trigger pull scale.
I borrowed it.
The results are interesting.
The Ruger Mk I breaks at 2 lb. 4 oz.
The Finnish Kiv/28-30 snaps at 2 lb. 6 oz. That's amazingly light for an old bolt action battle rifle, but the 28-30's are known to be match grade guns.
Standard AR triggers break at very nearly 7 lb. give or take three or four ounces.
I borrowed it.
The results are interesting.
The Ruger Mk I breaks at 2 lb. 4 oz.
The Finnish Kiv/28-30 snaps at 2 lb. 6 oz. That's amazingly light for an old bolt action battle rifle, but the 28-30's are known to be match grade guns.
Standard AR triggers break at very nearly 7 lb. give or take three or four ounces.
Purple!
The stock set from Cavalry Manufacturing arrived just a minute ago!
This color is insanely hard to get to show up the color that it actually is. See how it looks blue below?
The Cav pistol grip is full sized, unlike the 80% that's getting more and more common.
Cav's sling swivel is not near as nice as the one that was on the black furniture, so I swapped them.
It's got a texture that just grabs your hands, I rather like it.
More pics later when we show the boy!
Thanks to everyone who contributed and included me in their tent.
UPDATE
This color is insanely hard to get to show up the color that it actually is. See how it looks blue below?
The Cav pistol grip is full sized, unlike the 80% that's getting more and more common.
Cav's sling swivel is not near as nice as the one that was on the black furniture, so I swapped them.
It's got a texture that just grabs your hands, I rather like it.
Thanks to everyone who contributed and included me in their tent.
UPDATE
21 April 2013
Conditional
I've noticed something!
That behavior that's unacceptable when it's done by Person A is suddenly A-OK when performed by Person B.
Just list all of the things that were anathema under Bush, but are hunky dory under Obama.
Liberals are not the only ones guilty of this.
Quite a few Clinton era policies continued under Bush, and objections to them evaporated once the (D) became an (R).
Only rarely do I find pro gun pundits noticing that some pretty serious limits to gun ownership were passed and promulgated under Reagan and the Bushes.
If you stop objecting when the person wearing the jack boot changes, you don't really care about the freedoms being crushed.
That behavior that's unacceptable when it's done by Person A is suddenly A-OK when performed by Person B.
Just list all of the things that were anathema under Bush, but are hunky dory under Obama.
Liberals are not the only ones guilty of this.
Quite a few Clinton era policies continued under Bush, and objections to them evaporated once the (D) became an (R).
Only rarely do I find pro gun pundits noticing that some pretty serious limits to gun ownership were passed and promulgated under Reagan and the Bushes.
If you stop objecting when the person wearing the jack boot changes, you don't really care about the freedoms being crushed.
20 April 2013
19 April 2013
Ninety Percenter
It's so obvious that it really shouldn't need to be said.
If 90% of the nation really wanted gun control not a single congressman would be afraid to vote for it.
If 90% of the nation really wanted gun control not a single congressman would be afraid to vote for it.
Open
The Dunkin Donuts in Watertown, Massachusetts is open for business (according to Fox News).
The talking head is chastising them for going out during the lock-down.
However...
Think about it.
You own a Dunkin Donuts, you know the place will be crawling with cops...
I couldn't pass on that opportunity either.
The talking head is chastising them for going out during the lock-down.
However...
Think about it.
You own a Dunkin Donuts, you know the place will be crawling with cops...
I couldn't pass on that opportunity either.
Islam Again
The terrorists who blew up the Boston Marathon were Muslims?
This is my shocked face.
I don't know what to do about it and still have freedom of religion.
A decent first step might be admitting that Islam is at war with us. That admission leads to other assumptions in regards to our next step and that alone might make some of the deep pockets rethink their support of the war.
It has to weigh heavily in the minds of Kings that our army took out the largest, most experienced, army in the region TWICE in less than a month each time. The only complication was our desire to not hurt the innocent. The idea that we could rebuild a better place is what went wrong in the aftermath.
America is teetering on the edge of, "fuck 'em" and the next war there will not involve rebuilding anything but petroleum infrastructure and shooting any native who comes within mortar range of it.
This is my shocked face.
I don't know what to do about it and still have freedom of religion.
A decent first step might be admitting that Islam is at war with us. That admission leads to other assumptions in regards to our next step and that alone might make some of the deep pockets rethink their support of the war.
It has to weigh heavily in the minds of Kings that our army took out the largest, most experienced, army in the region TWICE in less than a month each time. The only complication was our desire to not hurt the innocent. The idea that we could rebuild a better place is what went wrong in the aftermath.
America is teetering on the edge of, "fuck 'em" and the next war there will not involve rebuilding anything but petroleum infrastructure and shooting any native who comes within mortar range of it.
Big Day
I still have trouble with it being 20 years ago it was Waco. 18 since OKC, which we wouldn't have had except for Waco.
Every April 19th I brace for some new tit for tat atrocity.
There's other symbolism that makes me brace.
Today is the 238th anniversary of the Battle of Concord.
Every April 19th I brace for some new tit for tat atrocity.
There's other symbolism that makes me brace.
Today is the 238th anniversary of the Battle of Concord.
18 April 2013
Customer Service
You judge a company not by how they do when everything goes right, but by how they handle things when they all go wrong.
Cavalry Manufacturing, when I called last week, said the purple stock set you guys so generously paid for was all boxed up and ready to go out the door.
I expected it today and no package, so I called back.
The person I spoke to today was the same person I spoke with earlier.
Now he's as confused as I am. They have no record of a shipping label being generated, and there's no box with my name and order number where it would be if no label had been generated.
They're just gone.
So he said he'd send another set out this afternoon.
It's a delay, but they're handling it.
Cavalry Manufacturing, when I called last week, said the purple stock set you guys so generously paid for was all boxed up and ready to go out the door.
I expected it today and no package, so I called back.
The person I spoke to today was the same person I spoke with earlier.
Now he's as confused as I am. They have no record of a shipping label being generated, and there's no box with my name and order number where it would be if no label had been generated.
They're just gone.
So he said he'd send another set out this afternoon.
It's a delay, but they're handling it.
Why Are You So Fucking Happy
What was defeated yesterday were amendments to the bill that will be voted on today.
Several of those amendments made that bill BETTER for us (in the sense that the shit sammich would have 20% less shit on it).
This bill is still alive and it's not time to rest on our laurels.
To the phones!
Several of those amendments made that bill BETTER for us (in the sense that the shit sammich would have 20% less shit on it).
This bill is still alive and it's not time to rest on our laurels.
To the phones!
17 April 2013
Guns To Grok
There are several guns that I am not particularly interested in owning long term, but I definitely want to have long enough to chew on.
A Mauser C.96 and a Luger top the list.
They are interesting in how they are built and the Luger is interesting in how it works.
After I shot them a few times and took them apart obsessively for a week or two I'd be done with them forever.
That's true of a lot of the guns I used to own, actually.
Once I've fingered it and figured out how it works I don't want it any more.
It's heresy, but I could easily be rid of the 1903A3 and Garand. I know them now and grok their essences.
Of course, I am lazy and not actively selling them. Listing them on Gunbroker creates an obligation. I don't feel like being obliging.
A Mauser C.96 and a Luger top the list.
They are interesting in how they are built and the Luger is interesting in how it works.
After I shot them a few times and took them apart obsessively for a week or two I'd be done with them forever.
That's true of a lot of the guns I used to own, actually.
Once I've fingered it and figured out how it works I don't want it any more.
It's heresy, but I could easily be rid of the 1903A3 and Garand. I know them now and grok their essences.
Of course, I am lazy and not actively selling them. Listing them on Gunbroker creates an obligation. I don't feel like being obliging.
Boston
The bombs in Boston were made from pressure cookers.
This rules out most left wingers as suspects, none of them have settled enough lifestyles to own something so domestic as cookware.
Clearly we're looking for a housewife of some Tea Party radical.
Martha Stewart is a housewife, conservative AND a convicted felon.
Test the fragments for white truffle oil!
We're on the other side of the looking glass now!
This rules out most left wingers as suspects, none of them have settled enough lifestyles to own something so domestic as cookware.
Clearly we're looking for a housewife of some Tea Party radical.
Martha Stewart is a housewife, conservative AND a convicted felon.
Test the fragments for white truffle oil!
We're on the other side of the looking glass now!
16 April 2013
Post BAG Day
The main problem for me and BAG day, other than funds, is that I've really got all the guns I really wanted.
There are a couple that I kinda-sorta want, and a couple of unobtanium holy grails, but no more must haves.
The closest thing we have to a must do is getting a tax stamp for The Lovely Harvey's platoon carbine so we can put a proper 14.5" barrel on it.
I kinda want a Browning HP, the grand daddy of the wonder nines.
A clone of a CAR-15 R607 would be really cool.
I've a strong hankering for that FG.42/II clone, but it's godawful expensive for the gun, magazines and ammo.
And that's really it.
I want optics for Dottie more than any new firearm.
I blame Tam. She went and skewered my self-identification. At one point I thought of myself as a collector, she pointed out and showed that I was merely an accumulator. Because of that epiphany I have to have a reason to buy a new gun. Is there something technical about the design I want to grok? Does it mate with the genuine collections I have going (.25 ACP, Browning or Finnish Mosin)?
That's why the HP is on the buy list, I've got quite the accumulation of Browning designs here. I've scored all the easily obtained .25's already, I am well into esoteric territory there. Just the one Finn left to find and it's the most expensive version. Actually, I've two Finns to find, but I'll never own one of them because there'll be an example of every single Ma Deuce model in my gun room before I find a Kiv/27 carbine.
There are a couple that I kinda-sorta want, and a couple of unobtanium holy grails, but no more must haves.
The closest thing we have to a must do is getting a tax stamp for The Lovely Harvey's platoon carbine so we can put a proper 14.5" barrel on it.
I kinda want a Browning HP, the grand daddy of the wonder nines.
A clone of a CAR-15 R607 would be really cool.
I've a strong hankering for that FG.42/II clone, but it's godawful expensive for the gun, magazines and ammo.
And that's really it.
I want optics for Dottie more than any new firearm.
I blame Tam. She went and skewered my self-identification. At one point I thought of myself as a collector, she pointed out and showed that I was merely an accumulator. Because of that epiphany I have to have a reason to buy a new gun. Is there something technical about the design I want to grok? Does it mate with the genuine collections I have going (.25 ACP, Browning or Finnish Mosin)?
That's why the HP is on the buy list, I've got quite the accumulation of Browning designs here. I've scored all the easily obtained .25's already, I am well into esoteric territory there. Just the one Finn left to find and it's the most expensive version. Actually, I've two Finns to find, but I'll never own one of them because there'll be an example of every single Ma Deuce model in my gun room before I find a Kiv/27 carbine.
15 April 2013
No Problem!
In just a few minutes the BATFE will be holding a press conference to tell us the name of the person, persons or entity that the destructive devices that detonated in Boston were registered to.
Or murderous criminals didn't fucking bother with a background check and a $200 tax stamp (each) when they made their bombs.
One or the other...
We'd better make bombs more illegal now!
HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK
Or murderous criminals didn't fucking bother with a background check and a $200 tax stamp (each) when they made their bombs.
One or the other...
We'd better make bombs more illegal now!
HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK HEADDESK
Public Declaration
I have transferred ownership of my firearms to my family's trust.
The Lovely Harvey has done the same with hers.
Since we are co-trustees of the trust, there's no change of ownership even if I leave her alone with any of the guns for any length of time. Same goes for me.
Even better, there's no requirement beyond putting an amended schedule A into my trust's file. There could be a hundred guns, there could be one.
The funny thing is we established the trust to avoid any confusion about illegal transfers for our NFA items. Seems strange we're doing the same thing for Title 1 guns.
The Lovely Harvey has done the same with hers.
Since we are co-trustees of the trust, there's no change of ownership even if I leave her alone with any of the guns for any length of time. Same goes for me.
Even better, there's no requirement beyond putting an amended schedule A into my trust's file. There could be a hundred guns, there could be one.
The funny thing is we established the trust to avoid any confusion about illegal transfers for our NFA items. Seems strange we're doing the same thing for Title 1 guns.
Waste of Time
I called Senator Nelson's office with the idea of stating my opposition to the Manchin-Toomey steaming pile.
I realized at about the second ring that it would do no good.
I also realized that as long as I had his staffer on the phone she couldn't take calls from anyone else.
Very nice lady. Chatted with her about energy policy for about half an hour. A complete waste of everyone's time, but it was my form of mini-filibuster on his help.
I realized at about the second ring that it would do no good.
I also realized that as long as I had his staffer on the phone she couldn't take calls from anyone else.
Very nice lady. Chatted with her about energy policy for about half an hour. A complete waste of everyone's time, but it was my form of mini-filibuster on his help.
BAG Day
While today is officially Buy A Gun Day, I don't have any new additions to point to.
I never manage to schedule my acquisitions around today because what few guns I buy anymore are more along the stumbled across it one time only deals than anything carefully considered and planned.
Perhaps if I hadn't had to buy a refrigerator, I would have bought my buddy's Browning High Power.
He's not actively selling it, so it will probably be there when I finally save up the money again.
I am strongly considering selling my M1903A3 to gather said funds since the Springfield just hangs on the wall looking sorry for itself.
I never manage to schedule my acquisitions around today because what few guns I buy anymore are more along the stumbled across it one time only deals than anything carefully considered and planned.
Perhaps if I hadn't had to buy a refrigerator, I would have bought my buddy's Browning High Power.
He's not actively selling it, so it will probably be there when I finally save up the money again.
I am strongly considering selling my M1903A3 to gather said funds since the Springfield just hangs on the wall looking sorry for itself.
Euology
When I die I want everyone I know to expound to anyone who will listen about what a miserable excuse for a human being I was.
Argue that the world is a better place now that I've left it.
Speculate at why it took so long for me to die and if there'd been any justice I'd have died sooner.
You get bonus points if the believe what you are saying!
PS: If I die doing something selfless or heroic, express shock and disbelief that such a horrid person would ever make such a sacrifice for others.
Argue that the world is a better place now that I've left it.
Speculate at why it took so long for me to die and if there'd been any justice I'd have died sooner.
You get bonus points if the believe what you are saying!
PS: If I die doing something selfless or heroic, express shock and disbelief that such a horrid person would ever make such a sacrifice for others.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)