I tend to carry a 1911 in a shoulder holster.
I wonder how much of the comfort in this is derived from being a tank crewman and carrying a 1911 in a shoulder holster when we went to the field.
It's pure familiarity I am sure.
17 February 2012
3 comments:
You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.
Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.
If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.
If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I carry a 1911 in a shoulder holster. Its derived from it being a comfortable means of carry and goes well with my dress code.
ReplyDeleteAlso I dunno about you but a thick gun in a shoulder rig tends to press into my ribs, the ultra-thin profile of the 1911 serves very well IMHO.
I've often felt that if someone were to make a polymer gun with the same width as a 1911 they'd sell like hotcakes.
ReplyDeleteBut considering that a SIG P232 is a single stack .380 that's wider than a 1911 I doubt the manufacturers will ever catch on that there's a market.
Kahr comes DAMN close. The TP45 is damn near identical to my S&W1911Sc. Its a hair smaller, and a hair wider.
DeleteTheir 9x19 offerings are 1911 slim.
Why is your P232 such a porker? I know my PM45 is fatter than my 1911 because they went with the cheaper, and easier to manufacture (and SIG invented) fat-daddy locking lug on the chamber hood, vs. the twin locking lugs inside the slide.
But the P232 is a blowback!!! wtf?