I keep reading, over and over, how a ban on normal capacity magazines might be acceptable.
No.
Why?
Because fuck you.
Why else? And your mother.
I've even posted how having smaller magazines doesn't really make much difference.
That's not the issue at all.
Once the idiots in government get the idea that they can dictate magazine capacity, then they will decide that ten is too many, then seven, then five...
They already believe this is the case and the do-nothing-don't-make-waves supreme court isn't helping.
It is difficult to fight against anger, for a man will buy revenge with his soul. Heracleitus, 500 B.C.
DISCLAIMER
Viewing or use of this blog or any contents or links contained herein by any person or entity within the confines of the states of Arizona and/or Tennessee is prohibited .
Violators of this policy agree to hold the owner of this blog, its contents and all links contained herein, harmless to any harm or offense taken or perceived.
Permission to use any content on this site is explicitly denied to Robert Farago, his family, his friends, his associates, his pets, and his employees and/or employer and/or their employees either in part or whole.
This blog is not Strunk and White compliant; read with all due caution, diligence and pity.
Due to ITAR regulations, Godless Foreigners™ are required to avert their eyes.
19 January 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
My take, boiled down into one sentence, is that private citizens have even more need for standard-capacity magazines than do law enforcement officers.
ReplyDelete