John Moses Browning designed the cartridge that killed Hitler.
His hand touched everything that won the war!
John Moses Browning designed the cartridge that killed Hitler.
His hand touched everything that won the war!
Thanks to Wollfe in the comments we know that I didn't quite get it right from what C&Rsenal showed.
The Winchester Model 1887 shotgun has a cartridge elevator akin to the Lebel.
You can load the tube with all five rounds, put a round on the elevator and pop a round in the chamber then close the action without stripping the round off the elevator.
That's a shots+2 action because a Lebel is shown that way too.
I needed to put an extended magazine on my 870 to get more than 5 rounds total!
JMB(PBUH)! for the win!
Happy birthday to John Moses Browning!
I only own a couple examples of his work, but they're among my favorites.
I'd not hesitate to buy more.
The best John Moses Browning guns are from after he's in the cold, cold ground.
The M1911A1 morphs into the .38 Super Gov't Model.
But "his" best design is the Grand Puissance.
This gun was brought to fruition by his apprentice, Dieudonne Saive.
Saive lacks the name recognition that Browning gets, and two of his designs get accredited to Browning. The Grand Puissance and "Baby" Browning.
Never mind that Mr. Saive also begat the MAG; still in wide service.
I forgot John Moses Browning's birthday.
Again.
It's more post-worthy if I remembered.
My .380 Pocket Hammerless is just about my favorite JMB design.
File under: "Stop liking things I don't like!"
Found a thread at the wretched hive of scum and villainy known as Arfcom asking what the point of owning a Browning High Power was.
Other than I like it?
The only real "problem" with one compared to a more modern design is that it's heavy. But it's not THAT heavy. Same weight at a Beretta M9, and just 0.3 lb. heavier than a Glock 17.
People forget that extra mass helps with recoil.
Lots of people complaining about the feel of the grip. Can't agree with them here, mine fits like it was made for my hand. I think JMB and I have the same hands, I've seen this with his designs before.
The difference in capacity is mitigated by there being flush 15-round magazines for them (and cheaper and more available than the original 13-rounders too).
Hammer bite is real, and mine bites me. It's not that big a deal. Take. The. Pain.
Some stuff that didn't come up were the sights being products of their time. There's not a lot you can do about the with early through Mk.2 guns; unless you completely disregard future collectors and have the slide milled for dovetails.
Have you ever noticed that the venerable High Power is nearly the same size as a Glock 19 which everyone loves? Actually, it's smaller than a 19 because it's slimmer.
The trigger is kinda bad, but it's nothing you can't get used to and shoot good groups with.
The magazine disconnect is irritating, but it's easily removed and improves the trigger.
Would I carry one?
Qualified, "no." I bought one to have one and have never invested in any holsters. You are not unarmed with one and I've carried older designs.
Do I carry one?
No. I carry a souless plastic fantastic.
But that's not the point of owning a classic!
Life would be very dull if I pared things down to just what was needful.
Prolly only have about three guns here too.
I've been issued a couple.
I've owned a few.
They fit my hand well and I shoot them well.
I've, thankfully, had no problems with any I've owned.
My last issue gun kept shedding its front sight because the unit armorer didn't know how to stake a new one in. I don't know either, but it's not my job.
I like how they are slim.
I dislike that they are heavy.
I think that I shoot them well enough that their lower capacity compared to the soulless plastic that has supplanted it doesn't matter. But I prefer more chances to hit the target afforded by the newer designs.
I must have the correct sized meat hooks that the grip safety never gave me a bit of trouble.
1911's have soul. As does an HP-35.
There's even soul in a metal framed Smith auto, like the 59.
I like the storied history of the thing and how it remains in production despite the advances in technology and the naysayers.
I like how you can make it completely yours from a list of parts that's at least as big as what you can do with an AR, even if it lacks the Lego-like simplicity and ease of installation.
Marv's Ruger LCP Max shoots Hornady Critical Defense low and left.
My 1926 made Colt Pocket Hammerless throws it low and left as well (aiming at the -0; 7-yards).
The SIG ammo also shoots low and left in Marv's gun. Just a little left for me when I aim at the -1.
For some reason I lobbed one round from each brand WAY low and left. Operator error, I think.
Pelvic girdle shots count, right?
Still, that 96 year old gun shoots pretty damn good all things considered.
I am a fan of John Moses Browning.
I own several of his creations and a couple he gets undeserved credit for.
Fine guns, nothing wrong with them.
Well...
Except for that whole obsolescent thing.
Dude's been dead for 96 years.
His last designs weren't much of his by the time they hit market and Saive's been dead for 52 years and he'd been retired for 16 years before that.
But we're getting to the point where "I'm not driving no infernal combustion engine Robert Fulton's good enough for me!" proportions.
Don't get them started on double or triple expansion engines let along them new fangled turbines.
And when you say you don't like these new guns, and are sticking to Browning, these new guns ARE Brownings!
Except for materials they work just like Saive's improvement to the tilting barrel premiered on the Grand Puissance.
I love my Hi Power, but I'm packing a souless plastic pal who's fun to be with.
Improved materials, lighter weight, more capacity, smaller package, more resistant to corrosion and lint.
There's just no down side.
Then when you add in that Gunwriters® have to run thousand round torture tests to distinguish between models and that so many are passing the excessive torments...
Yeah.
Now that the rant is done. Don't comment without saying "rutabaga" to prove you got this far.
I've carried 1911's in two calibers (.45 and .38 Super).
I've pocketed a 1908 Pocket Hammerless in .380.
I've toted an FN Hi-Power a time or two.
They do the job. They did the job.
They did it as well as any gun I've ever carried because I've never, once, had to draw or fire in self defense.
Nothing about new guns being a vast improvement in many objective ways makes the old JMB guns no longer work!
Nothing about new 9mm hollow point technology makes a .45 ACP ball round make smaller holes.
These old guns still work. Note my carrying a S&W 59 for a while: I was testing that they still work.
The take-away isn't that the old, proven, designs no longer work; it's to not close your mind and to be open to changes which make your experience better. But not too open or you will end up being a jaded Gunwriter® who no longer derives any joy from shooting.
His presence is still felt in firearms design to this very day.
Happy 167th Birthday John Moses Browning!
High Speed Wobble, a Belgian tripel from The Liquid Garage.
My mom's father's old pipe.
A Belgian triple of FN designs.
Happy New Year everyone!
I take a picture every year containing some alcohol, a firearm and some tobacco.
The alcohol is often beer and I often end up in a race to get everything all framed while there's still a head on the beer.
It looks better in the pic to have a head on the beer.
Next year will have a pipe for the tobacco.
That complicated things because I wanted to get a wisp of smoke too.
I don't think I succeeded, but you will have to wait until Jan 1, 2022 to see.
Probably a Tisas rebranding.
MSRP of $700 is decent.
The FN Grand Browning will never be economically made, if it is ever produced.
Tis a pity. I bet there's a small market for such a gun, but it'd be at least a grand.
He did the Colt 1910 too: