Posts
One Florida sheriff is touting their relationship with Flock and how it helped them find a missing child.
The thing they are missing is they are, in essence, saying that it's OK to enter every house in their jurisdiction without a warrant to catch a child pornographer.
The huge question is, "Does the good outweigh the bad?"
Considering the contents of the Bill of Rights, no.
The founders were firmly of the idea that it's better to let a few criminals get away with it than to trod on the rights of the innocent to catch them.
Something we're going to have to address is the issue of private organizations collecting information and then selling it to the government(s).
I suspect that if we decide that if the government buys something they cannot, legally, collect on their own is forbidden; the collection of such data by private entities will stop.
No comments:
Post a Comment
You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.
Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.
If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.
If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.