I keep reading, over and over, how a ban on normal capacity magazines might be acceptable.
No.
Why?
Because fuck you.
Why else? And your mother.
I've even posted how having smaller magazines doesn't really make much difference.
That's not the issue at all.
Once the idiots in government get the idea that they can dictate magazine capacity, then they will decide that ten is too many, then seven, then five...
They already believe this is the case and the do-nothing-don't-make-waves supreme court isn't helping.
19 January 2013
1 comment:
You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.
Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.
If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.
If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
My take, boiled down into one sentence, is that private citizens have even more need for standard-capacity magazines than do law enforcement officers.
ReplyDelete