There are a few companies that don't sell firearms to Californian customers.
This upsets quite a few people, mostly Californians.
I don't think the boycott is doing anything to help the situation, but I understand the "let them sink" feeling.
What would have an effect would be a refusal to sell to government agencies in California. Imagine if Glock refused to sell to Californian police agencies unless they would allow sales to normal citizens of the same guns.
Might just change some things.
Same goes for NY(f)C or Massachusetts.
28 December 2010
1 comment:
You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.
Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.
If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.
If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Judging by the way they (mis)govern their state, Californians shouldn't be trusted with slingshots, much less firearms, even less EBKARs.
ReplyDelete