When you begin to use your opponents terms, you've lost the debate.
This is why not a single one of my AR's is an "assault weapon" or "assault rifle".
They're not assault rifles because they aren't select-fire. They are not assault weapons because that is my opponent's term.
That is why I become pedantic about terminology.
It's why I decided my time was better spent not reading some gun blogs.
Tugging on a penis and calling it a teat will not get you milk.
30 April 2012
3 comments:
You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.
Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.
If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.
If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Yea but tug long enough and youll get something for your trouble. When i first got my ar a guy i work with spent 10 mins telling my that it was an assault rifle and i was going to end up in jail for having it. After the 10 mins i just had to ask how stupid he was because it wasnt one. He told me that the ar stands for assault rifle. He got mad at me when i just started laughing and told he what it means then googled it just ti prove it.
ReplyDeleteAR = Assault Rifle? Tell him about the AR-5 sometime just to get his dander up.
ReplyDeleteI call my Saiga an EBR...and people still don't know what it means.
ReplyDelete