DISCLAIMER

Viewing or use of this blog or any contents or links contained herein by any person or entity within the confines of the states of Arizona and/or Tennessee is prohibited .

Violators of this policy agree to hold the owner of this blog, its contents and all links contained herein, harmless to any harm or offense taken or perceived.

Permission to use any content on this site is explicitly denied to Robert Farago, his family, his friends, his associates, his pets, and his employees and/or employer and/or their employees either in part or whole.

This blog is not Strunk and White compliant; read with all due caution, diligence and pity.

Due to ITAR regulations, Godless Foreigners™ are required to avert their eyes.

13 October 2010

A gaming note.

The H&R T223 pictured below was selected by the player to be a little different and because the rifle had 40 round magazines.  Extra capacity is a good thing and since the game was set before 30 round mags became available for the AR this was a sensible decision.

It's also a munchkin decision.

It's also the real reason.  A few of these were used by SEAL Team 2 in 1968 and the users cited the larger magazine capacity as their reason for choosing the T223 over an M16 despite the weight penalty.

Edited to add pictures to make what I was saying clearer.


H&R T223 on finished figure:

The making of an H&R T223 from an H&K G3A4, H&K MP5 and Walther Mkb.42(W):
First I needed a stock: which the MP5 provided.


Then I needed a rifle body.  The G3A4 is actually a tad too long and the handguard here is the later type instead of the more squared style that would be correct.  I am not talented enough to take 2.1mm off the length of the gun and change the contour of the handguard.  However, when you see it in person, the illusion is convincing.


Finally I needed a magazine: provided by a smashed up Maschinenkarabine that was in my parts bin.
Then I assembled.




3 comments:

  1. In the previous post, which is below.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ok, I am confused because in that post you call it "a clone of an XM177E2", while in this one you call it "The H&R T223".

    Or am I even more confused than that?
    I don't see any post with a picture labeled "H&R T223".

    ReplyDelete

Try to remember you are a guest here when you comment. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention.