Ms Peterson has expressed that the background check required by the Brady Act has prevented some number of "criminals" from buying a gun.
John Lott Jr reminds me of false positives. ht Alphecca.
Well, Ms Peterson? I was denied two years ago.
I am not a criminal. I have never been accused of a felony, let alone arrested, tried or convicted.
I have passed two very stringent background checks to obtain my conceal carry permit and own a short barrel rifle.
Why was I denied in 2008? A false positive. Am I banned from owning guns because I was denied? No. In fact I took possession of the guns I was denied on a few days later. It was a system glitch. It was a little unnerving, but I hear that it's not uncommon.
So those two guns are counted by you as preventing a sale to a prohibited person? It's wrong on both counts, it didn't prevent the sale, only delayed it and a prohibited person was not involved.
This is why we mock you and your friends at Handgun Control Inc; or whatever you have changed the name to lately.
Click here to submit $0.00 US for a lifetime subscription
Posts
Comments
No comments:
Post a Comment
You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.
Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.
If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.
If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.