During the election I had a rather heated debate with Anglave about Bill Ayers.
He said something like Mr Ayers was following his strong convictions in doing the stuff that I would call terrorism.
Something sat wrong about that. Today I figured out what bugged me about it.
If Bill Ayers was following the courage of his convictions and that he did what he truly saw was necessary to save us from the evil that he saw, why then is he not proud of it? Well, he was until it started to hurt his buddy at the polls. Then all that pride and courage evaporated. We stopped hearing "Guilty as Hell/Free as a Bird".
Want a terrorist who really was following his convictions and remained convinced that what he did was required? Timothy McVeigh.
I don't condone what McVeigh did, but he didn't change his story about why or even if; nor did any conservative associate their campaign with him.
I think that's important.
Click here to submit $0.00 US for a lifetime subscription
Posts
Comments
No comments:
Post a Comment
You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.
Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.
If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.
If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.