Then Stop Paying Them

The courts, again, have ruled that the police don't have to do the job that the public thinks they should be doing.

The police in question, this time from Ulvade, Texas, again, have shown that they like the power that authority gives as long as they don't have to run towards the sound of gunfire and actually be the heroes they often claim title to.

I'm watching video of the police not doing their jobs when riots rage and property is destroyed.

Once again, I am asking, "why are we paying them?"

At least twice I've seen parents being held at a perimeter while their children were being murdered while the police did nothing but maintain that perimeter.

What good were those cops?

Yes, I am aware of police who do live up to the title of hero and represent the ideal.

Because it's becoming very apparent that they are a minority, laws need to be changed to force the majority to adhere to the expectations of their employers, The People.

The court's rulings might be valid if one small thing was different about becoming a cop.

If they were conscripted, perhaps, there would be a point that we couldn't expect them to enter a dangerous situation where they could be killed in the course of saving the citizens they swore to defend.

But they weren't involuntarily conscripted to the job.

They volunteered.  They actively sought the education and training to become cops.

THEY WANTED THE JOB!

Until the moment comes where the reason they have medical and pension plans far in excess to the people surrounding them hoves into view.

Then they refuse.

The military, something that lots of cops like to emulate, has a term: dereliction of duty.

What happened at so many school massacres is a dereliction of duty.

A duty they swore to do, refused to do, and then begged the courts to get out of the consequences of that dereliction.

Well, fellow citizens, I think we should start getting our congresses to stop sucking cop cock so damn hard and to remember who THEY work for.

Get of your asses.