DISCLAIMER

By viewing this blog the user is explicitly holding the author or authors harmless of any defamation, libel or slander. Further they agree that they have travelled to the state of Florida and are subject to Florida laws and codes alone and hold that no law of the other 49 states or any county or municipal subdivision apply.

Viewing or use of this blog or any contents or links contained herein by any person or entity within the confines of the states of Arizona and/or Tennessee is prohibited . Violators of this policy agree to hold the owner of this blog, its contents and all links contained herein, harmless to any harm or offense taken or perceived.

Permission to use any content on this site is explicitly denied to Robert Farago, his family, his friends, his associates, his pets, and his employees and/or employer and/or their employees either in part or whole.

Permission to use any content on this site is explicitly denied to Kevin Richard Bartmess, his family, his friends, his associates, his pets, and his employees and/or employer and/or their employees either in part or whole. Use of this content or replication of any content found within, including links, renders violators of this policy subject to a charge of $16,000 (US) payable on demand.

10 June 2014

Cleaning Guns

It started as an article noting that carbon can build up on a NiB plated bolt carrier group on The Firearm Blog.

The comments have degraded into DI vs Piston gun design trolling.

I even commented...

Do you realize that the AR isn't actually direct impingement?
Have a look that the bolt carrier on an AG42 or MAS49 and you will see that the gas strikes or impinges on (hence the term) a pocket on the carrier's face and that sends it to the rear.
The AR has an expansion chamber inside the bolt carrier, and the bolt is a piston. The gas is not striking the bolt carrier, but passing through the gas key and into the chamber inside the bolt.
Time to stop using the term incorrectly in the gun world.
As far as popularity goes? I think that the only guns that use the Stoner gas system are AR's either AR15 or AR10 and their derivatives. And that's presently most of the 5.56 guns in existence for 50-25% the cost. Which is the real reason they've the taint of popularity against piston guns.
$800 AR or $2,400 SCAR? Quantify three times better than an AR and do it in terms of ammunition I might likely carry before any substantial difference in reliability will surface. Document it, show your work, PROVE the claim.
Or a claim is all it is. An anecdote.

Further down the comment chain someone is claiming that their piston gun saves them an hour of cleaning time.

ORLY?

What are you using for cleaning solvents?

This is something that's come up in my anecdotal experience too.  With a piston gun, no less.

There's an FN MAG machine gun coaxial to the main gun on an M1 Abrams.  It's called an M240 in the US system.  Using the issue Break-Free® CLP it takes hours to get that thing clean after a day on the tank tables.  This is because CLP's tend to be OK at each of the Cleaning, Lubricating and Protecting; but not actually good or great at any and normally much better at one than the other two.  Break-Free® CLP has an emphasis on the L.  It's an abysmal C.  LSA is a better C and it was developed when the Army issued three different products for doing CLP (Rifle Bore Cleaner, LSA and Cosmoline).

I don't have a MAG to clean with modern cleaning products.  But I do have ARs.  Break-Free® CLP took considerable time and effort to get an M16A2 clean; and we were tankers, we didn't shoot the M16 often or much.  Hoppes No 9?  Nearly no effort; but you have to lubricate the gun with a different product once it's clean.  And there isn't an hour's worth of cleaning to do.

Thus far the only CLP I've tried that seems to be pretty darned good at all three things is Frog Lube.  I didn't want it to be so either.  It ruins my, "C, L or P; pick one,"pithy line.

Still, if you want the carbon gone, a carbon solvent designed purely as such, will work faster and easier than any CLP out there.  Hoppe No 9 and Shooter's Choice are my favorites.  They're even copper solvents too.

Shooter's Choice and LSA cleaned a 1957 Ruger Standard that apparently had not been cleaned since it left the factory in about an hour.  You just don't get dirtier than a blow-back .22.  The main difficulty is getting to all the nooks and crannies to lift the dissolved carbon and not getting it to dissolve when you're using good solvents.

This comment thread raised the reliability thing again.

And again I am struck with, "how much ammo do you think you're going to be carrying?"

210 is the basic US infantry load.  That's a VERY low bar to pass.  How many rounds without cleaning is reliable enough?  Twice the basic load?  Five times the basic load?  Ten times the basic load?  210 rounds is 7 pounds of magazines and ammunition.  How much are you bringing?

And how subjective will our reliability tests be?  The obsolete and unreliable (if you read modern accounts) M1911 could barely choke down 6,000 rounds of ball ammo in acceptance testing and a randomly selected gun from each lot had to do 5,000 or the lot was rejected.  Issue load for anyone who got handed a 1911 in the US Army was a whopping three magazines.  22 rounds tops.

The main reliability problem with the 1911 in actual use was it rusting solid from being kept in a leather holster very rarely drawn let alone fired.

The more I learn about guns first hand the less I believe the internet.  The more I talk to people who were actually in combat with a particular weapon, the less I believe the internet.

4 comments:

  1. I use Mpro-7 for the C and CLP for the L....and my guns generally get a CLP wipe-down once or twice a year if they need it or not for the P.

    Also for 1911s, outside of the uber tight custom guns which I read and hear about choking because of how tightly they're fitted, seems all the 1911 issues I've seen are mag related. I just 47D it up and call it good.

    ReplyDelete
  2. 2,000 MRBS appears to be the industry standard.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The latent soldier in me won't let a gun get to 2,000 without a thorough cleaning. It took a conscious effort to get to the point of not cleaning the moment I got home from the range.

      Some of it comes from a natural monkey-curious that likes to take machines apart and put them back together. And since I'm in there anyways, may as well clean. One thing I really like about modern commercial cleaning products is they're so much easier on the gun than the old scrub with a bronze brush methods. I'm also in the "how did I live before Boresnake" camp.

      Of course Boresnakes seem to be a polarizing topic in its own right.

      Delete
    2. There's a couple of boresnakes in my range bag. I think they're handier than a pocket on a shirt.

      Personally? Maybe if you're a benchrest shooter who lives and dies by hundredths, they're something to worry about, but for a typical shooter, snake away.

      Delete

Try to remember you are a guest here when you comment. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.