28 September 2012

Unforgiven

The movie Unforgiven is often touted as an "anti-violence" film.

I'm just not seeing that.

What I see is the injustice and totalitarianism that comes from a government disarming its citizens.

Why don't I think that it's an anti-violence film?

English Bob, Munny and Ned were all brutally beaten because they were disarmed.

The prostitute Delilah was disfigured by a knife wielding customer who was later protected from real punishment by the government that was supposed to be protecting her.  Let alone that Skinny, the bar's owner, failed to provide her with a safe workplace.

It shows that vigilantism is a natural result of justice-denied.

It shows that violence most certainly does end some problems.  Will Munny's killing of the entire Big Whiskey police force obtained justice for Ned being whipped to death, revenge on Curly Bill for beating Munny and dispersed the posse that would have been chasing him come dawn.

It's anti-state monopoly on violence.

2 comments:

  1. Yeah its a movie against Statist Totalitarianism!

    Also note that Little Bill was a brutal sonofabitch (was he also a former outlaw, or am I confusing him with his many similar Western performances?) who was far more of a monster than any of the "Outlaws" ever could dream to be!

    ReplyDelete
  2. He did imply a less than savory past when conferring with Beauchamp.

    ReplyDelete

You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.

Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.

If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.

If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.