Got the M12 rack!
Kaylee's Aimpoint has to be removed to fit it. Olga might fit without the bipod, but doesn't need to. Cheyenne is pictured just to fill things in a bit and Kevina isn't because her EOTech is not easy to remove (but it'd hold zero).
Not bad for $50 for the rack plus gas and lunch for JT.
Also not shown is it's final location, gotta leave some mystery for the thieves. ;)
When I started building AR's I'd have never have thought that I'd have enough to fill an entire M12 rack, let alone having so many guns I out grew a locking cabinet.
I should fire-proof the room their in!
Update:
The middle-thick back strap for the MIAD keeps the bar from lowering on the rifle properly. The thin one works perfectly. That means that a MOE grip won't work with this rack either. Happily, the thin strap doesn't feel awful now like it did when I first got into AR's.
22 March 2014
21 March 2014
Firearm Friday
Valentine is zeroed. Reetta and Tatyana were shot too. All shots were hasty sling at 25 yards.
Top Left is initial zeroing of Valentine. Top right is finishing the box off.
Center is Reetta.
Bottom Left is Tatyana w/o bayonet. Bottom Right is Tatyana with bayonet. Typical 91/30 trick of tightening up with it attached.
Tatyana has an odd trigger that gives kind of a double click before going bang. It tricks you into thinking that you've broke the sear, but you haven't yet. This is not exhibited with dry fire.
Reeta is the typical SA Finnish kiv/39 trigger. Long pull that does nothing, then it stops a moment then breaks clean. The three rounds on the bottom were learning the trigger. The two in the center are a better example of how she shoots.
Willard took out his Vz-58 um... Vz-2008! The trigger is light and crisp. Ejection is just barely to the right of vertical. The folding stock iz teh suxxor. He's already looking for a fixed stock. The sights are near identical to an AK in use and precision, so it groups exactly like the Yugo AK clone he brought along for comparison (ie fill the 8-ring with 30 rounds). When you're shooting it instead of coon-fingering it, all of the controls actually fall right to your hand and everything seems natural, except the safety. Even so, it's not THAT hard, no harder than an AR safety for a lefty. Just don't think of it as a thumb control and it makes more sense.
Either it needs some break in or he's got a bad magazine. Towards the bottom of the mag, the left feed position would jam up in the feed way. Ah, the joys of surplus!
Valentine gave no surprises. She's an AR. I am still astounded at how accurate the Kotonics barrel is and saddened that things ended the way they did for poor Tim.
Top Left is initial zeroing of Valentine. Top right is finishing the box off.
Center is Reetta.
Bottom Left is Tatyana w/o bayonet. Bottom Right is Tatyana with bayonet. Typical 91/30 trick of tightening up with it attached.
Tatyana has an odd trigger that gives kind of a double click before going bang. It tricks you into thinking that you've broke the sear, but you haven't yet. This is not exhibited with dry fire.
Reeta is the typical SA Finnish kiv/39 trigger. Long pull that does nothing, then it stops a moment then breaks clean. The three rounds on the bottom were learning the trigger. The two in the center are a better example of how she shoots.
Willard took out his
Either it needs some break in or he's got a bad magazine. Towards the bottom of the mag, the left feed position would jam up in the feed way. Ah, the joys of surplus!
Valentine gave no surprises. She's an AR. I am still astounded at how accurate the Kotonics barrel is and saddened that things ended the way they did for poor Tim.
Presented As Opinion
I often label myself an autodidactic polymath; but my first formal higher education was in mechanical drafting, which is engineering lite. All the math, none of the humanities!
I am constantly encountering this truth:
I am constantly encountering this truth:
My best friend is a lawyer, bright, gifted, ... PhD in law; bored with his job, he decided to study engineering. After his first quarter, he came to me and said that the two "C"s he'd achieved in Engineering Calculus 101 and Engineering Physics 101 were the first two non-A grades he'd ever gotten in college, and that he had had to study harder for them than for any other dozen classes he'd had. "I now understand", he said, "why engineers and their like are so hard to examine, whether on the stand or in a deposition. When they say a thing is possible, they KNOW it is possible, and when they say a thing is not possible, they KNOW it is not. Most people don't understand know in that way; what they know is what we can persuade them to believe. You engineers live in the same world as the rest of us, but you understand that world in a way we never will."
I don't think that you have to love math to be an engineer, but you are going to have to learn it. That means that you're going to have to do the homework, correctly. Mistakes and "close enough" are the ways to build bridges that fail.
Many times I've said stated something flat-out. Time and again I encounter someone who won't understand the answer because they don't do math.
Engineering types, when they state opinion, will qualify the shit out of the statement.
"I prefer the FAL to the G3."
But statements of fact aren't.
"The FAL fires a 7.62x51mm NATO cartridge."
Am I wrong? Well, then refute it with fact.
Often times these statements of fact don't include proofs for even laymen because you've either done the work and understand it already or no amount of explaining will bring you up to speed because you didn't learn math.
There's an entire universe closed to you because of it and it's something to be ashamed of, not proud.
How Dare You Wear That Hat While In Uniform?
It's spring, sir!
20 March 2014
A New Dimension
Dimensioning a part is a perishable skill.
I am knocking the rust off now.
Luckily, the parts for the silencer are actually very simple.
While figuring out how to dimension some features I am reconsidering them because it'd be simpler to machine them with a different process and that changes the shape of the feature slightly.
A good example is the slots in a flash-hider. They are tapered because the cutter is tapered, a square cutter was found to get caught as the work flexed.
I am knocking the rust off now.
Luckily, the parts for the silencer are actually very simple.
While figuring out how to dimension some features I am reconsidering them because it'd be simpler to machine them with a different process and that changes the shape of the feature slightly.
A good example is the slots in a flash-hider. They are tapered because the cutter is tapered, a square cutter was found to get caught as the work flexed.
Rantings
I just had a moment of clarity.
If this topic pisses me off so much, why keep writing raging screeds on it?
CLUNK as the mental transmission finally catches a gear.
I really don't care about the topic as much as the anger would seem to indicate. It's like the seeming of caring from putting pixel to screen angers me.
So I shan't touch upon it again. Would that I realized it sooner.
If this topic pisses me off so much, why keep writing raging screeds on it?
CLUNK as the mental transmission finally catches a gear.
I really don't care about the topic as much as the anger would seem to indicate. It's like the seeming of caring from putting pixel to screen angers me.
So I shan't touch upon it again. Would that I realized it sooner.
19 March 2014
Broke
Broke 200,000 page views, that is.
And it's a ho-hum moment.
I get about 200-250 a day so it eventually adds up and I'm flattered that people swing by and have a read.
Still, I'd do this if there were zero page views a day.
Weer'd Beerd is why I am on Blogger at all. I was happily spinning my wheels on LiveJournal with around ten page views a day for years.
The blogroll's gotten bigger and smaller as I gained and lost interest.
I've made friends and lost them.
I've been a jester and an ass.
An expert and a fool.
And I'll do it again.
And it's a ho-hum moment.
I get about 200-250 a day so it eventually adds up and I'm flattered that people swing by and have a read.
Still, I'd do this if there were zero page views a day.
Weer'd Beerd is why I am on Blogger at all. I was happily spinning my wheels on LiveJournal with around ten page views a day for years.
The blogroll's gotten bigger and smaller as I gained and lost interest.
I've made friends and lost them.
I've been a jester and an ass.
An expert and a fool.
And I'll do it again.
Term Limits
One of the big problems with term limits is the fuckweasil knows that they will not have to face the voters again.
That lets them get up to all sorts of mischief.
The unlimited reelection system gives us career fuckweasils who have an intimate knowledge of the system and how to manipulate it.
I wonder if there's a middle ground solution.
No consecutive terms. You do your two years as a representative or six as a senator and you've got to sit out the next election.
They can't go career so easily, and since they might want to run again they have to temper their behavior because they could easily be facing the voters again time after next.
That lets them get up to all sorts of mischief.
The unlimited reelection system gives us career fuckweasils who have an intimate knowledge of the system and how to manipulate it.
I wonder if there's a middle ground solution.
No consecutive terms. You do your two years as a representative or six as a senator and you've got to sit out the next election.
They can't go career so easily, and since they might want to run again they have to temper their behavior because they could easily be facing the voters again time after next.
18 March 2014
Design Finished
Got some better dimensions of the HEL E4A so I modified my drawing accordingly.
I'll be breaking the parts out (they're on different layers here) and dimensioning them so someone (me with some supervision) could make them, then printing the drawings to attach to my Form 1 and a $200 check... In a couple of months anyways.
The new information I got was really interesting.
The rear support (tapered end) has a slot cut into it that engages on the bayonet lug. You slide the rear support on, screw on the body down over the rear support. There are six equidistant 8-32 holes in the support and three plain holes in the body. Screw the body down tight, then back off to the nearest set of aligned holes. Then you put some cap screws into the three aligned holes to hold the body to the support. The slot in the support keeps it from unscrewing!
Ingenious!
The front cap is flush with the front of the body and has a big slot in it so you can remove the baffle stack.
This, by all accounts, will not be near as good as a modern suppressor for sound reduction, just 26 dB. I think a similarly sized modern unit gets close to 40 dB. But the point of this retro stuff isn't to make the best design possible, it's to recreate what was vintage.
I'll be breaking the parts out (they're on different layers here) and dimensioning them so someone (me with some supervision) could make them, then printing the drawings to attach to my Form 1 and a $200 check... In a couple of months anyways.
The new information I got was really interesting.
The rear support (tapered end) has a slot cut into it that engages on the bayonet lug. You slide the rear support on, screw on the body down over the rear support. There are six equidistant 8-32 holes in the support and three plain holes in the body. Screw the body down tight, then back off to the nearest set of aligned holes. Then you put some cap screws into the three aligned holes to hold the body to the support. The slot in the support keeps it from unscrewing!
Ingenious!
The front cap is flush with the front of the body and has a big slot in it so you can remove the baffle stack.
This, by all accounts, will not be near as good as a modern suppressor for sound reduction, just 26 dB. I think a similarly sized modern unit gets close to 40 dB. But the point of this retro stuff isn't to make the best design possible, it's to recreate what was vintage.
The Bolt Gun
A Fudd rifle...
I want a scoped bolt action.
Not because I need one or have any use I'd put one to that I'd actually do.
I just think that every shooter should have one before they can say they've got the minimums covered.
But there's always something shinier or something that needs fixing.
Then there's conflicting emotions.
Because I don't have a use for one, a cheap one will suffice as well as an expensive one. A $400 Axis package with scope sits in the safe and collects dust just as well as a mega-buck minute-of-subatomic-particle gun.
But if I finally break down, save my pennies, and buy one; I want a nice one! Luxurious bluing, polished walnut... That's more expensive, but less than what a couple of the AR's have run.
Some features I have no doubts on. I do not want a blind magazine well. I don't think it's safe to unload by cycling the action repeatedly. I don't know if I care if the magazine is detachable or not.
I am ambivalent about iron sights.
I am uncertain what the ideal caliber for me is too. I've already got .308 and .30-06 in the house. Do I go with those or something like .270 Winchester or .280 Remington? .270 has appeal since it's the same bullet diameter in my beloved 6.8. If I reloaded I've have a stronger opinion, I am sure.
And all of that ignores the brand!
I've always had a soft spot for the Browning A-Bolt. But they're made by Miroku in Japan. That bugs me for some ephemeral reason I can't put my finger on while I wouldn't think twice about buying a Weatherby made in Japan by Howa.
I don't own a Winchester anything, so a Model 70 has an appeal. This creates its own sub-debate about pre-64, post-64 and post-post-64.
Savage makes good guns that have a reputation for being more accurate than their price would suggest.
Ruger renamed their line-up and I don't know which is the entry level and which is the high end. Browning's X-Bolt caused the same confusion for me.
Not sure I'd buy a Howa branded gun, even if I'd happily own a Weatherby Vanguard.
Confusion and indecision reigns!
I want a scoped bolt action.
Not because I need one or have any use I'd put one to that I'd actually do.
I just think that every shooter should have one before they can say they've got the minimums covered.
But there's always something shinier or something that needs fixing.
Then there's conflicting emotions.
Because I don't have a use for one, a cheap one will suffice as well as an expensive one. A $400 Axis package with scope sits in the safe and collects dust just as well as a mega-buck minute-of-subatomic-particle gun.
But if I finally break down, save my pennies, and buy one; I want a nice one! Luxurious bluing, polished walnut... That's more expensive, but less than what a couple of the AR's have run.
Some features I have no doubts on. I do not want a blind magazine well. I don't think it's safe to unload by cycling the action repeatedly. I don't know if I care if the magazine is detachable or not.
I am ambivalent about iron sights.
I am uncertain what the ideal caliber for me is too. I've already got .308 and .30-06 in the house. Do I go with those or something like .270 Winchester or .280 Remington? .270 has appeal since it's the same bullet diameter in my beloved 6.8. If I reloaded I've have a stronger opinion, I am sure.
And all of that ignores the brand!
I've always had a soft spot for the Browning A-Bolt. But they're made by Miroku in Japan. That bugs me for some ephemeral reason I can't put my finger on while I wouldn't think twice about buying a Weatherby made in Japan by Howa.
I don't own a Winchester anything, so a Model 70 has an appeal. This creates its own sub-debate about pre-64, post-64 and post-post-64.
Savage makes good guns that have a reputation for being more accurate than their price would suggest.
Ruger renamed their line-up and I don't know which is the entry level and which is the high end. Browning's X-Bolt caused the same confusion for me.
Not sure I'd buy a Howa branded gun, even if I'd happily own a Weatherby Vanguard.
Confusion and indecision reigns!
Labels:
Blogging,
Bolt Gun Agony,
FUDD,
Godless 270 WCF,
Guns,
Savage,
Shooting
Alternate State
Every so often I check to see how healthy the alternate calibers market is for the AR based on variety and availability from Midway...
6.8x43mm SPC: 26 loadings listed from 8 makers. 5 available from 3.
6.5 Grendel: 7 loadings listed from 3 makers. Just one available.
.300 AAC Blackout: 30 loadings listed from 11 makers. 4 available from 3.
.300 Whisper: 5 loadings from 2 makers. Just one available.
.30 Remington AR: 5 loadings from 1 maker: 2 available.
6.8 is down a bit from last year; .300 AAC is up a bit. And you can actually buy some ammo this year!
It's really pretty stable even compared with 2012.
6.8x43mm SPC: 26 loadings listed from 8 makers. 5 available from 3.
6.5 Grendel: 7 loadings listed from 3 makers. Just one available.
.300 AAC Blackout: 30 loadings listed from 11 makers. 4 available from 3.
.300 Whisper: 5 loadings from 2 makers. Just one available.
.30 Remington AR: 5 loadings from 1 maker: 2 available.
6.8 is down a bit from last year; .300 AAC is up a bit. And you can actually buy some ammo this year!
It's really pretty stable even compared with 2012.
Why You Need A Garand
Patton called it the finest battle implement ever devised.
It's the weapon used to kill the shark at the end of Jaws. You've prepared for the Zombie Apocalypse™ but are you prepared for a Sharkanado?
Not only did the same model rifle fight in both World War Two and Korea, in many cases it was the actual same rifles!
It's lighter than a fully loaded AK! (I know!)
You get to tell the story about the noise the clip makes when it ejects!
It's the weapon used to kill the shark at the end of Jaws. You've prepared for the Zombie Apocalypse™ but are you prepared for a Sharkanado?
Not only did the same model rifle fight in both World War Two and Korea, in many cases it was the actual same rifles!
It's lighter than a fully loaded AK! (I know!)
You get to tell the story about the noise the clip makes when it ejects!
17 March 2014
AS-47?
I parroted that Hugo Schmisser might have had a hand in the development of the AK.
I was roundly informed that Soviet Records indicated that to not be the case.
You mean the SEALED TOP SECRET Soviet Records? You couldn't mean those, since they are well... unavailable. If you claim to have read them, we have a term for that... Please extinguish your slacks.
What that really means is nobody knows for certain.
Considering that the USSR routinely lied about things, it makes it easy to believe that it's an Avtomat Schmisser model of 1947.
There's solid enough evidence about the state of the art of Soviet engineering at the time that it could honestly be entirely home grown.
That the Soviets effectively abducted several prominent German gun designers coupled with a long history of lying to make themselves look more capable than they were lends weight to the argument that they didn't do the designing.
I was roundly informed that Soviet Records indicated that to not be the case.
You mean the SEALED TOP SECRET Soviet Records? You couldn't mean those, since they are well... unavailable. If you claim to have read them, we have a term for that... Please extinguish your slacks.
What that really means is nobody knows for certain.
Considering that the USSR routinely lied about things, it makes it easy to believe that it's an Avtomat Schmisser model of 1947.
There's solid enough evidence about the state of the art of Soviet engineering at the time that it could honestly be entirely home grown.
That the Soviets effectively abducted several prominent German gun designers coupled with a long history of lying to make themselves look more capable than they were lends weight to the argument that they didn't do the designing.
Lurning Kerve
I've bumped against a wall in learning physical skills more than once.
I am definitely doing something wrong, I cannot identify exactly what and thus cannot change anything specific about what I am doing to correct for it.
The end result is a whole lot of flailing around until something clicks and I can do it.
It's why I cannot throw a frisbee or play golf. I've not had the time or inclination to put in the flailing.
Instructions consisted of a lot of frustrating time listening to someone explain in some alien grunting language what I was doing wrong. "Then with your mouth tendrils..." is how it felt. I felt like I could not learn to do it correctly because I lacked the hideous non-human anatomy granted them that made this task simple and they could never explain it to my any more than I could convince someone who is color blind that the top and bottom lights in a traffic signal are different colors.
Grunts like, "let go of it sooner!" Throw "No, SOONER! That was LATER!"
It definitely made a huge number of "fun" activities "work" and since I was no good at them, I was not asked to participate, because the team I was on would lose. This in turn made them no fun at all, so after a bit it stopped being worth it to put in the work.
This led me to an affinity to mechanical things. Being a mechanic is dealing with readily definable and repeatable things. Turn the wrench to the left, bolt loosens; go the other way it tightens. EVERY TIME!
Yet I help friends out on their cars and it's like I was grunting with the aliens...
I changed the timing belt on The Lovely Harvey's Civic. Her friends act like I'm some sort of wizard. There was nothing complicated about it, just some things were hard to reach.
There are members of the car club I'm in who are flat out lost when you say, "did you check the ground?" They actually look at their feet!
I know how they feel.
I am definitely doing something wrong, I cannot identify exactly what and thus cannot change anything specific about what I am doing to correct for it.
The end result is a whole lot of flailing around until something clicks and I can do it.
It's why I cannot throw a frisbee or play golf. I've not had the time or inclination to put in the flailing.
Instructions consisted of a lot of frustrating time listening to someone explain in some alien grunting language what I was doing wrong. "Then with your mouth tendrils..." is how it felt. I felt like I could not learn to do it correctly because I lacked the hideous non-human anatomy granted them that made this task simple and they could never explain it to my any more than I could convince someone who is color blind that the top and bottom lights in a traffic signal are different colors.
Grunts like, "let go of it sooner!" Throw "No, SOONER! That was LATER!"
It definitely made a huge number of "fun" activities "work" and since I was no good at them, I was not asked to participate, because the team I was on would lose. This in turn made them no fun at all, so after a bit it stopped being worth it to put in the work.
This led me to an affinity to mechanical things. Being a mechanic is dealing with readily definable and repeatable things. Turn the wrench to the left, bolt loosens; go the other way it tightens. EVERY TIME!
Yet I help friends out on their cars and it's like I was grunting with the aliens...
I changed the timing belt on The Lovely Harvey's Civic. Her friends act like I'm some sort of wizard. There was nothing complicated about it, just some things were hard to reach.
There are members of the car club I'm in who are flat out lost when you say, "did you check the ground?" They actually look at their feet!
I know how they feel.
Disappoint
I'm a brony, I admit it.
Sadly, the latest season is really not very good.
It's had good episodes, but it's fallen into the same pattern as season 3. Formulaic children's wheel of morality pap.
Dang it.
Still, the good episodes this season have been excellent, but the wheat:chaff ratio is getting bad.
Sadly, the latest season is really not very good.
It's had good episodes, but it's fallen into the same pattern as season 3. Formulaic children's wheel of morality pap.
Dang it.
Still, the good episodes this season have been excellent, but the wheat:chaff ratio is getting bad.
16 March 2014
Put A Bid On
The proliferation of all things AR (not to mention Mosin) has caused the gun safe to swell.
I've put a bid down on an M12 rifle rack.
Normally I don't bother bidding on them because shipping is a killer for a 42x36x10 steel frame.
This one is an easy jaunt for pick-up.
I've put a bid down on an M12 rifle rack.
Normally I don't bother bidding on them because shipping is a killer for a 42x36x10 steel frame.
This one is an easy jaunt for pick-up.
15 March 2014
Professional
The line between professional and amateur is whether or not you are paid.
It does not always carry any indication of expertise.
Of course, is it better to be a knowledgable slut or an inept whore?
It does not always carry any indication of expertise.
Of course, is it better to be a knowledgable slut or an inept whore?
Single Issue
There's a problem with being a single issue voter.
The fuckweasils we elect aren't single issue fuckweasils.
They have a panoply of things they want to vote on and implement that have nothing whatsoever to do with the one issue you voted for (or against) them on.
Harry Ried might be an excellent example. While he was pro-gun and having someone pro-gun as senate majority leader would be good for gun owners; what about the rest of him? I really didn't know much about him then, since he's in Nevada not Florida.
Well, it turns out that like all fuckweasils he'll toe the party line and his party is pretty much opposed to most everything that most gun owners support that aren't gun related.
Florida has Bill Nelson. He's anti-gun. He's hard-core Democrat. He's gotten the vote of a lot of conservative woman. Why? Single issue. Abortion.
Why would a conservative woman vote for a liberal over the abortion issue? Because to them it's not about murdering babies, it's about their right to make their own decision and not be reduced to breeding kine. Do they agree with any other position? Nope. But, "abortion is murder" reads as "bitches WILL breed!"
There are slews of other issues too. Immigration. Welfare. Military spending. Environmental issues. Taxes. Tariffs.
If you pick one, and only one, to vote about you're going to get that fuckweasil's position on everything else too; regardless of that one thing you care a lot about.
The really depressing thing is that once you start looking past your single issue, you start finding there's no candidates who don't have a massive disqualifier in their stance.
I am reminded, again, that the only reason any of this matters is because the government has gotten so much larger than its mandate and sent its tendrils into every aspect of our lives. If the government wasn't actively involved in, say, the bacteria content of milk; I would not need to consider a fuckweasil's position on the matter.
The fuckweasils we elect aren't single issue fuckweasils.
They have a panoply of things they want to vote on and implement that have nothing whatsoever to do with the one issue you voted for (or against) them on.
Harry Ried might be an excellent example. While he was pro-gun and having someone pro-gun as senate majority leader would be good for gun owners; what about the rest of him? I really didn't know much about him then, since he's in Nevada not Florida.
Well, it turns out that like all fuckweasils he'll toe the party line and his party is pretty much opposed to most everything that most gun owners support that aren't gun related.
Florida has Bill Nelson. He's anti-gun. He's hard-core Democrat. He's gotten the vote of a lot of conservative woman. Why? Single issue. Abortion.
Why would a conservative woman vote for a liberal over the abortion issue? Because to them it's not about murdering babies, it's about their right to make their own decision and not be reduced to breeding kine. Do they agree with any other position? Nope. But, "abortion is murder" reads as "bitches WILL breed!"
There are slews of other issues too. Immigration. Welfare. Military spending. Environmental issues. Taxes. Tariffs.
If you pick one, and only one, to vote about you're going to get that fuckweasil's position on everything else too; regardless of that one thing you care a lot about.
The really depressing thing is that once you start looking past your single issue, you start finding there's no candidates who don't have a massive disqualifier in their stance.
I am reminded, again, that the only reason any of this matters is because the government has gotten so much larger than its mandate and sent its tendrils into every aspect of our lives. If the government wasn't actively involved in, say, the bacteria content of milk; I would not need to consider a fuckweasil's position on the matter.
14 March 2014
Over A Barrel
One of the places that sells repop 20" pencil barrels has sent out their email saying that tonight is the night they have them in stock!
Money at the ready.
Fingers poised over the keyboard...
Just two hours to go!
They only have these things twice a year and my selling off everything in the parts bin is facilitating the purchase.
The waiting is all.
Now that The Lovely Harvey has finished Valentine the purple AR, I can restore Tabitha to being an M16A1 (late pattern). In addition to the barrel mentioned above, I need a complete bolt carrier group, weld spring and snap ring.
Money at the ready.
Fingers poised over the keyboard...
Just two hours to go!
They only have these things twice a year and my selling off everything in the parts bin is facilitating the purchase.
The waiting is all.
Now that The Lovely Harvey has finished Valentine the purple AR, I can restore Tabitha to being an M16A1 (late pattern). In addition to the barrel mentioned above, I need a complete bolt carrier group, weld spring and snap ring.
Don't Be Like Mike
On top is a Century Arms Vz-2008, a commercial adaptation of the Czechoslovakian Vz.58. On the bottom is a Zastava AK clone.
Both are 7.62x39mm. Both have 30 round capacities. Both are piston gas operated and air cooled. Other than looking similar that's about the end of how they're alike.
It's almost as if the team in Brno said, "no matter what, make it different than the AK."
I'd say the succeeded.
It's LIGHT. Really light. And this is with the steel receiver that Century makes, the originals were aluminum.
It's a hair under 8 lb. loaded with 1.45 lb. magazines.
The Yugo came in at 9.3 lb. loaded with 1.8 lb magazines.
The folding stock is teh suxxor for consistent cheek welds.
Willard is laying on the pressure for me to adopt something in 7.62x39mm, that's why I had these here to take pictures of. Going to the range with them and an SKS sometime next week for a more detailed comparison.
Smaller Army
The Army is shrinking.
I am not entirely sure that it's completely bad.
We've definitely got our noses in a lot of things that aren't our damn business and should butt out. A smaller Army would facilitate that since we'd be unable to butt-in.
In days long past...
One of the ways you could tell the US was serious about something was we sent the Army. We'd send the Marines at the drop of a hat, but if the Army was there; it was warre and it ended with your nation's name being amended to Territory of...
Long before double ewe double ewe eye.
Our present state is amazingly impotent for as capable as it is. At least a smaller military will scale the capability down to its actual ability...
I've long said it, if you're not willing to make the place you're sending the troops Territory of the United States; then don't send them. Yes, I know that means a reversion to the old nation state model of international affairs, but like so many things that worked for so long; it is time tested under real-world conditions. Present foreign policy and military use is being developed for a world that someone hopes exists.
I should add that I am not saying we should not have an Army at all or that we should never use it. What I am saying is we should stop looking for trouble in places we have no interests.
Should a place of no-interest become a breeding ground of people who force us to notice, thus take interest; it's a territory when we're done and it's culture is reduced to Taco Bell and St Patrick's Day levels as a part of OUR culture.
Europe may be fine with never ending a war and fighting it over and over. I'm not. And until President Wilson, neither was America.
I am not entirely sure that it's completely bad.
We've definitely got our noses in a lot of things that aren't our damn business and should butt out. A smaller Army would facilitate that since we'd be unable to butt-in.
In days long past...
One of the ways you could tell the US was serious about something was we sent the Army. We'd send the Marines at the drop of a hat, but if the Army was there; it was warre and it ended with your nation's name being amended to Territory of...
Long before double ewe double ewe eye.
Our present state is amazingly impotent for as capable as it is. At least a smaller military will scale the capability down to its actual ability...
I've long said it, if you're not willing to make the place you're sending the troops Territory of the United States; then don't send them. Yes, I know that means a reversion to the old nation state model of international affairs, but like so many things that worked for so long; it is time tested under real-world conditions. Present foreign policy and military use is being developed for a world that someone hopes exists.
I should add that I am not saying we should not have an Army at all or that we should never use it. What I am saying is we should stop looking for trouble in places we have no interests.
Should a place of no-interest become a breeding ground of people who force us to notice, thus take interest; it's a territory when we're done and it's culture is reduced to Taco Bell and St Patrick's Day levels as a part of OUR culture.
Europe may be fine with never ending a war and fighting it over and over. I'm not. And until President Wilson, neither was America.
Laborious
I am copy-pasting my LiveJournal entries over to here.
The export feature might work, but Blogger's import just sits there for hours apparently doing nothing.
There are numerous posts that aren't going to get moved because they were based on pictures or links that no longer exist. That's a bummer because some of them were quite good.
Some of the sites still exist, but have moved the linked content. Most have gone dark.
It's only been since 2005 and they're just gone. That sucks.
It's happened to me twice that places hosting my pics have just quit on me. I hope Flickr hangs on better since I'm actually paying them for the hosting.
The export feature might work, but Blogger's import just sits there for hours apparently doing nothing.
There are numerous posts that aren't going to get moved because they were based on pictures or links that no longer exist. That's a bummer because some of them were quite good.
Some of the sites still exist, but have moved the linked content. Most have gone dark.
It's only been since 2005 and they're just gone. That sucks.
It's happened to me twice that places hosting my pics have just quit on me. I hope Flickr hangs on better since I'm actually paying them for the hosting.
13 March 2014
Can We
If we can agree to disagree; can we likewise disagree to agree?
12 March 2014
Fate!
I've had a couple three Mosin-Nagant M-1891/30's... I've sold or given all of them away for one reason or another. The given-away have come back more than once as well.
I thought that I'd managed to get rid of the last one... And it's still gone!
Willard presented me with a gift today.
Tatyana is a 1941 made Izhevsk 91/30 with every indication of being a pre-Barbarossa gun.
Compared to a 1942 model...
I thought that I'd managed to get rid of the last one... And it's still gone!
Willard presented me with a gift today.
Tatyana is a 1941 made Izhevsk 91/30 with every indication of being a pre-Barbarossa gun.
Compared to a 1942 model...
Military Weapons
While doing research on that E4A Noise Suppressor some synapses reconnected.
I noticed that for a large part of American history the populace at large actually did out-gun the Army.
Then, as now, the population vastly outnumbered it; but back then the common hunting gun was actually a better rifle in many ways than the full-power bolt action the Army issued.
First there's the lever action. It's the 19th century assault rifle! High capacity and rate of fire. That led, eventually, to the .30-30.
Then there's the scoped bolt guns. Conceptually similar to the Army rifle of the day, but lightened to the extreme and equipped with clear telescopic sights. Far better optics than were often issued to snipers, in fact.
Those days are long gone.
Despite what the press says, the police are not outgunned by the citizen, let alone the Army. The citizen has been slowly denied access to advances in weaponry thanks to 1934, 1968 and 1986. This will eventually be bad for the Army too since the '86 change put the final regulatory nail in the coffin of casual experimentation.
When it was $200 to try out an idea for a new machine gun, people might risk it just to see if it worked out. When it's around $10,000 for all the licenses just to start playing around; ah fuck it.
It should be noted that Gatling, Maxim, Lewis and Browning weren't government arsenals but private experimenters. The well entrenched M16 is the result of such private experimentation.
We damn near owe it to ourselves to repeal these laws to drop barriers to entry on many industries simply because (the defacto) protecting the established companies stifles experimentation and creativity.
If we'd had the regulatory environment of today in 1809 we'd have the Pony Express handling the bulk of our mail.
I noticed that for a large part of American history the populace at large actually did out-gun the Army.
Then, as now, the population vastly outnumbered it; but back then the common hunting gun was actually a better rifle in many ways than the full-power bolt action the Army issued.
First there's the lever action. It's the 19th century assault rifle! High capacity and rate of fire. That led, eventually, to the .30-30.
Then there's the scoped bolt guns. Conceptually similar to the Army rifle of the day, but lightened to the extreme and equipped with clear telescopic sights. Far better optics than were often issued to snipers, in fact.
Those days are long gone.
Despite what the press says, the police are not outgunned by the citizen, let alone the Army. The citizen has been slowly denied access to advances in weaponry thanks to 1934, 1968 and 1986. This will eventually be bad for the Army too since the '86 change put the final regulatory nail in the coffin of casual experimentation.
When it was $200 to try out an idea for a new machine gun, people might risk it just to see if it worked out. When it's around $10,000 for all the licenses just to start playing around; ah fuck it.
It should be noted that Gatling, Maxim, Lewis and Browning weren't government arsenals but private experimenters. The well entrenched M16 is the result of such private experimentation.
We damn near owe it to ourselves to repeal these laws to drop barriers to entry on many industries simply because (the defacto) protecting the established companies stifles experimentation and creativity.
If we'd had the regulatory environment of today in 1809 we'd have the Pony Express handling the bulk of our mail.
11 March 2014
Thag Not Grok
I immediately concede that newer designs such as Glock and the M&P are better designs. Far simpler, easier to manufacture and made more advanced materials.
The 1911 is an old design. It's complicated and needs lots of pay-attention and tribal-know-how to make correctly.
Mr Yam is not mistaken about today's 1911.
What I am baffled by is how none of what everyone hates about them was present in my tank battalion in 1987-89.
Our guns were shot out, but they went bang every time and cycled as long as there were bullets. When I arrived at Panzer Kaserne, the newest of our pistols had to be at least 41 years old. My issue gun had a Colt frame and a Remington-Rand slide!
Because I was fascinated with guns in general I volunteered to help the company arms-room sergeant in keeping the guns up. It was 90% making sure they were turned in clean. He replaced a couple of front sights and we replaced a lot of worn out stocks and a couple of mainspring housings that'd lost their lanyard rings.
The magazines we DX'd were obviously physically damaged, like bent damaged. I never tuned an extractor, or saw it done.
It can't all be due to only using cartridge, caliber .45, ball, M1911 can it?
The 1911 is an old design. It's complicated and needs lots of pay-attention and tribal-know-how to make correctly.
Mr Yam is not mistaken about today's 1911.
What I am baffled by is how none of what everyone hates about them was present in my tank battalion in 1987-89.
Our guns were shot out, but they went bang every time and cycled as long as there were bullets. When I arrived at Panzer Kaserne, the newest of our pistols had to be at least 41 years old. My issue gun had a Colt frame and a Remington-Rand slide!
Because I was fascinated with guns in general I volunteered to help the company arms-room sergeant in keeping the guns up. It was 90% making sure they were turned in clean. He replaced a couple of front sights and we replaced a lot of worn out stocks and a couple of mainspring housings that'd lost their lanyard rings.
The magazines we DX'd were obviously physically damaged, like bent damaged. I never tuned an extractor, or saw it done.
It can't all be due to only using cartridge, caliber .45, ball, M1911 can it?
Sunk
Ms Sink's bid to become Florida's 13th Congressional District's representative has failed.
I guess I'll never find out what she meant by bipartisan now.
Frankly, I am surprised. Pinellas County is on the blue side of purple.
I guess I'll never find out what she meant by bipartisan now.
Frankly, I am surprised. Pinellas County is on the blue side of purple.
I Cannot Believe That Happened
Here I am, putting together an AR lower...
I forgot how the trigger spring was supposed to go.
I've only put together about twenty of these things now, how did I forget that?
It's together!
I like CMMG's parts kits, but I loathe the 4/5 scale pistol grip and the socket head cap screw to attach it.
I'm pretty sure that Cavalry Manufacturing is who makes the grip since its identical to the purple one.
I forgot how the trigger spring was supposed to go.
I've only put together about twenty of these things now, how did I forget that?
It's together!
I like CMMG's parts kits, but I loathe the 4/5 scale pistol grip and the socket head cap screw to attach it.
I'm pretty sure that Cavalry Manufacturing is who makes the grip since its identical to the purple one.
Daily Life
Role playing gaming centers around people who aren't everyday folks.
GURPS: Accounting and GURPS: Fast Food Worker didn't do well in playtesting...
Yet, even in the Traveller universe those same people you see everyday will have their counterpart.
Most people live the same life you do today. They never really travel, they go to work, they socialize they're just normal people.
It just happens there's a starport or two on their planet and goods can conceivably shipped in from a lot farther than China.
It's pretty boring and not good adventure fodder. It makes the future so... mundane.
It's a bit strange to think that a city in Traveller will look a lot more like Los Angeles than Logan's Run.
GURPS: Accounting and GURPS: Fast Food Worker didn't do well in playtesting...
Yet, even in the Traveller universe those same people you see everyday will have their counterpart.
Most people live the same life you do today. They never really travel, they go to work, they socialize they're just normal people.
It just happens there's a starport or two on their planet and goods can conceivably shipped in from a lot farther than China.
It's pretty boring and not good adventure fodder. It makes the future so... mundane.
It's a bit strange to think that a city in Traveller will look a lot more like Los Angeles than Logan's Run.
Memories Really Are That Short
I got an email from the NRA telling me that gun owners are poised to take back the Senate from Harry Reid.
I remember the last time Senator Reid was up for re-election that the NRA backed him over the republican candidate because he'd been so good about guns...
Since the NRA was instrumental in handing the senate to Mr Reid, they should adopt a different tone about killing the monster they had a hand in creating. *POP* Pulling my head out of my ass.
I occasionally wonder if, perhaps, that getting someone less good on guns but far better on every other liberty would be preferable.
If we had more of our general liberties, I think the gun thing would matter less.
Edit:
Memories are so short, in fact that I can't remember a timeline.
In 2010 Senator Ried had been pretty good on guns and there were solid reasons to think he'd continue to be.
The NRA had no way of knowing how things would turn and now they're in the rough position of having to oppose a former friend.
Thanks to Tam for kicking me in the teeth so my head would be propelled from my nethers.
I remember the last time Senator Reid was up for re-election that the NRA backed him over the republican candidate because he'd been so good about guns...
I occasionally wonder if, perhaps, that getting someone less good on guns but far better on every other liberty would be preferable.
If we had more of our general liberties, I think the gun thing would matter less.
Edit:
Memories are so short, in fact that I can't remember a timeline.
In 2010 Senator Ried had been pretty good on guns and there were solid reasons to think he'd continue to be.
The NRA had no way of knowing how things would turn and now they're in the rough position of having to oppose a former friend.
Thanks to Tam for kicking me in the teeth so my head would be propelled from my nethers.
E4A Shush
Here's my recreation of the HEL E4A. It's preliminary, of course, since some details will change depending on the processes chosen to make the parts.
I've even come up with a not-suppressor version for a not-NFA clone.
The not-NFA would have to be welded closed, I think. But it'd be easy to make the body in a way that the baffles could be dumped and the plain tube substituted.
The threaded part that goes on the muzzle (almost dead center) on the silencer version has vents to allow gas into the chamber that overlaps the barrel. I am not sure how many and what size those holes are. They'd have to be absent in the not-NFA version.
10 March 2014
Details
The AN-PVS-2 has a funny looking rubber eyepiece.
It's a light lock!
By pressing your eye to the eyepiece it opens a clamshell sort of deal and lets you see the image. That clamshell doesn't open until the outside of the cup is all around your eye, so no light escapes to be seen by the enemy.
A very clever design!
Recursive
When you write about not writing, you're writing, not not writing...
SQUIRREL!
SQUIRREL!
Numbers
A 1976 Formula One car put out about 450-500 horsepower.
A 2008 Corvette puts out about 430.
Of course, that F1 car only weighs 1,325 lb. The Vette is more than double.
A 2008 Corvette puts out about 430.
Of course, that F1 car only weighs 1,325 lb. The Vette is more than double.
Throw Back
I carry a 1911...
That makes sense.
My car has a clutch pedal, eight cylinders and the back wheels spin too.
Yet I also embraced smart-phones, sequential electronic fuel injection and traction control.
I guess I am just confused.
That makes sense.
My car has a clutch pedal, eight cylinders and the back wheels spin too.
Yet I also embraced smart-phones, sequential electronic fuel injection and traction control.
I guess I am just confused.
Retro Shush
That's a section of an HEL M4 noise suppressor. Mounted to an M16A1 it's way overgassed and needs an additional gas vent hole on the bolt carrier. That makes it an integral suppressor because without it, too much gas is vented and your M16A1 is a straight pull bolt action.
Take 5 baffles off the front and shorten it the length of those baffles and you have an HEL E4A noise suppressor. It's louder than the M4, but can use a standard bolt carrier.
I think that I can scale that drawing.
Time for another Form 1 it looks like!
Damn I have too many irons in the fire.
09 March 2014
Is That Singing I Hear
I've sailed too close to the shoals by buying that Browning.
Like a Warlock too close to the hills of Aldagmor; I hear the faint muttering...
Glock.
Glock the sirens sing.
I am damned.
Luckily I've committed too much to the STEN project and The Lovely Harvey has balls in the air with the Purple AR Revivification.
Yet, I can see a Glock 17 in the moderately near future.
I've owned one or three before. The last one became a gift to Aunt Bat when she graduated college. Dear Gods, has it really been nearly 20 years?
Like a Warlock too close to the hills of Aldagmor; I hear the faint muttering...
Glock.
Glock the sirens sing.
I am damned.
Luckily I've committed too much to the STEN project and The Lovely Harvey has balls in the air with the Purple AR Revivification.
Yet, I can see a Glock 17 in the moderately near future.
I've owned one or three before. The last one became a gift to Aunt Bat when she graduated college. Dear Gods, has it really been nearly 20 years?
On Kicking In Doors
I've written before that if my existing guns become illegal I've no incentive to not upgrade to something that's illegal at present.
If there's no difference between a full-auto M4A1 and a semi-auto M4gery; in for a penny, in for a pound.
The seeming excitement of some Connecticut cops to start kicking doors are forgetting an extremely ancient gun. Setting one up is illegal, but what have they to lose?
It gets scarier when you consider that plans to make remote and automated gun turrets that can track, lead and fire are readily available. You'd have to ban Digi-Key...
The moral of the story is never back someone who has nothing to lose into a corner. That makes the only path out through you.
If there's no difference between a full-auto M4A1 and a semi-auto M4gery; in for a penny, in for a pound.
The seeming excitement of some Connecticut cops to start kicking doors are forgetting an extremely ancient gun. Setting one up is illegal, but what have they to lose?
It gets scarier when you consider that plans to make remote and automated gun turrets that can track, lead and fire are readily available. You'd have to ban Digi-Key...
The moral of the story is never back someone who has nothing to lose into a corner. That makes the only path out through you.
Partisan
OK, Ms Sink.
You are correct, we're sick of partisan bickering in DC.
What Republican policies are you going to accede to and adopt to become bipartisan?
I'll give you a clue here, Ma'am; it's not just the partisan politics we voters are sick of. We're also sick of bipartisan being defined as "agrees with the Democrats".
I think we're also sick of politicians who keep coming back over and over again despite repeated rejections at the ballot. You share this with Mr Crist.
You are correct, we're sick of partisan bickering in DC.
What Republican policies are you going to accede to and adopt to become bipartisan?
I'll give you a clue here, Ma'am; it's not just the partisan politics we voters are sick of. We're also sick of bipartisan being defined as "agrees with the Democrats".
I think we're also sick of politicians who keep coming back over and over again despite repeated rejections at the ballot. You share this with Mr Crist.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
