Metal injection molding, also known as MIM.
I think it's misunderstood.
It's a process of making parts with complicated shapes cheaply. That's really it.
The problem with it is too many shops try to use it on forged and machined parts that are not suited to the process.
The part produced via MIM, while dimensionally identical, is not the same metallurgically. What that means is, although it fits, it breaks.
Parts designed from the outset as MIM parts will be fine.
What it boils down to is your material selection is predicated by the form and function of your part. Some materials and forming processes cannot be used for particular parts. Some parts are process neutral.
Sometimes you can tell a smith did the design and not an engineer. That sounds disparaging, but it's not. They are related, but separate paths of learning about machines. The differences stand out when you jump into the realm of theory and conjecture and begin applying new processes to old designs.
An example that sticks out is a cast receiver for an M1A. Casting technology today and steels available mean you can make a receiver that's just as strong as a forged one made from the 1930's processes Springfield National Armory was using in 1950. "Can make" is an important part of that phrase, some don't.
Viewing or use of this blog or any contents or links contained herein by any person or entity within the confines of the states of Arizona and/or Tennessee is prohibited .
Violators of this policy agree to hold the owner of this blog, its contents and all links contained herein, harmless to any harm or offense taken or perceived.
Permission to use any content on this site is explicitly denied to Robert Farago, his family, his friends, his associates, his pets, and his employees and/or employer and/or their employees either in part or whole.
This blog is not Strunk and White compliant; read with all due caution, diligence and pity.
Due to ITAR regulations, Godless Foreigners™ are required to avert their eyes.