I see we've made it more illegal to do an illegal act against someone because they are a member of a specific group.
Do
I get a shorter sentence if I murder someone out of love? Is it better
if I killed someone who was a member of a group I really respected?
Would that be called a respect crime?
I am all about individual
liberty. Hate crimes are crimes against individuals, not groups. Hate
crime laws are all about elevating the group over the individual.
Listening to the people advocating them I wonder if they care about the
ethnicity of the victim more than the fact the poor soul was murdered.
For
me, it doesn't matter that the victim was black. It matters that they
were murdered. The murderer should be punished. For murder. There are
several crimes that I think deserve capital punishment, murder is on
that list. I intend to execute the criminal, what more can we add to
that sentence? I am reminded of the execution of John Wayne Gacy. He
was convicted of killing 33 people. His lawyers attempted to delay his
execution by claiming that the evidence didn't support some small
portion of the convictions, like 5 of them, and a new trial should be
convened. The judge essentially said, "We will go forward on the
execution of the remaining, uncontested, convictions. Just one would be
enough."
He's a murderer! Execute him.
He's a murderer who hated the victim because they were gay! Execute him. Being a murderer was enough.
Preferably the waste of carbon will be ended by swift action of their last intended victim. Saves time and money.
A secondary thing that always bothers me about hate crimes is that it is also thought policing.
I
have every right to hate; that does not grant any right or power to do
anything against the object of my hate. If I hate blacks, women or gays
as long as I keep it to myself I am not hurting anyone. Literally.
We
should also consider that the enhanced sentencing provisions and the
controversy about them will cause some perpetrators to act where they
otherwise wouldn't because of the enhance notoriety that would come with
the crime. Punishing the perpetrators of crimes has two purposes,
removing the people who do such things from the general population and
to deter people from committing those crimes. To create a situation
where a criminal is encouraged by the law is irresponsible.
No comments:
Post a Comment
You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.
Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.
If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.
If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.