Media bias.
They've certainly picked a side.
I think many people don't mind because it's their side.
I've
heard more and more from people who I would never have thought were
interested in politics ask, "When did the media stop reporting the
events and start making everything an editorial?"
I can't really
answer that. I noticed they were doing that somewhere in the Branch
Davidian stand off. Wikipedia says that was 1993. That's where I
noticed the media calling an M2A1 Bradley and an M728 CEV tanks. The
Bradley is an infantry combat vehicle and the M728 is a combat
engineering vehicle. The M728 is based on an M60A1 tank, but I know
from watching them during the Gulf War that they have people on staff
who know the difference between the vehicles used and tanks. Even using
the term "armored vehicle" instead of tank would have been accurate.
But they chose tank. It was inaccurate. It had to be deliberate. Why?
I've never found an answer to, "why?" that didn't scare me.
I also have to ask, "How come every time something that I know something about is presented, the media gets key things wrong?"
It's made it so I cannot trust them. They have a side and are advancing that side's agenda.
It
must be older than 1993 though. Remember when Walter Cronkite declared
the war in Vietnam unwinnable right after the Tet Offensive? We won
that battle. We'd actually won the war. Congress (Democrat majority)
voted to cut funding and end air-support for the South Vietnamese;
snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. The North Vietnamese were
still receiving material support from both USSR and China. Most people
don't know that. The evacuation of Siagon took place almost two years
after the last US combat troops had left. South Vietnamese troops, with
US funding and supplies along with US air support had successfully
repelled an invasion from the North the year before. So many people
think that the evacuation of Saigon (1975) is DURING the withdrawal of US combat troops (1973). Gee, where do you think that this impression comes from?
Happily,
the internet is combating this. A year ago there was little mention
of the order of events at the end of Vietnam. Now there's Wikipedia!
Prior to the internet it took some digging in military history sections
to find this stuff; now it's online.
No comments:
Post a Comment
You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.
Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.
If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.
If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.