08 August 2025

Mea Culpa

While trying to make a point, I didn't delineate fine enough.

In the world of medicine there's hyper fine gradations of "nurse".

Each with it's own skills, license and education requirements.

Then there's the job that a person is required to do and the level of nurse mandated to do it.

When I mentioned that my CNA relatives and RN friend agreed that the skill set to do the work is similar it was in reference to the job that the, now arrested, unlicensed former CNA was performing.

The home-health care job can be performed by just about any half intelligent, conscientious, and reasonably careful schlub.  The actual skill requirements to perform the job are very low.

The skill, education and license requirements are very high. 

But people doing the job have to be rated to do some serious shit that never comes up in the course of the job.

A CNA isn't trained to do RN stuff when the world is pear shaped.  I am sorry if I implied they had those skills when talking about barriers to entry.

But I think we can agree that you don't need to be certified to the level that RN's are to hand out little paper cups with pills in them.  Yet, in Florida, an RN has to pass the pills out to the lower rated folks to deliver to patients.

I we can also agree that it doesn't take as many RN's as are mandated to the work.  Especially since they justified having this level of education and skills as a "just in case" of pear shaped crisis. 

This also ignores that a practicing emergency room RN is living in a vastly different environment than an ACLF charge nurse or a home health care service nurse. 

The actual job that two RN's of my acquaintance do at an ACLF and a hospice, respectively, is sit behind a desk and surf the internet all night.  When something happens it's, essentially in two categories:  Sign off on what their minions did to fix the problem or call the doctor.  One of them BRAGS about how little they do.

The job these two are doing we called CQ, or charge of quarters, in the Army.  I don't think it needs an RN to do it.  Just like most home health.

Again, the person arrested with a CNA level of education was doing the RN job long enough to earn a promotion it was a routine background check that noticed the lack of certification for the job they were performing, not a failure to perform the tasks. 

3 comments:

  1. Maybe I read too much into your previous comment on the subject, but I understood the whole thing exactly the way you explained it today. There are probably many other occupations that require licensure but under normal conditions can be completed by experienced but unlicensed persons.
    The first one that came to mind was construction. A lot of people can build a house, and up to code at that. But without that contractor's license the government won't allow them to work in the profession. Allegedly it is to save the homeowner from shoddy work. But in a libertarian world, the marketplace would shut out the person who does poor work.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ex: asbestos specialty certification

      The entirety of that work is nothing that a regular guy cannot do.
      I've had professional relationships with at least two contractors fully certified for remediation of asbestos materials.
      I see 'at least two', because it seems there were more, but I do not recall exactly right now.

      Both laughed about how it was such a put on. They could charge a minimum 5x or more the normal price. Actually, the sky is the limit because all work on a project would stop until remediation was completed and signed off and it was few who had the certs.

      Each of those two hired me on to their team just so I could see what all the hub bub was about. It's fake, it's fraudulent, but it's a goldmine protected by certification.

      Delete
    2. Too, the pertinent laws allowed that a homeowner, with no training, specialized or other, could himself physically remove or handle asbestos. The ONE regulation was the total amount of asbestos materials must be less than a specified amount. This applied to commercial buildings too. If, provided, the owner of the building performed the work. The allowable total amount of asbestos material was different in different states, but generally around 200 sq ft.

      But, since neither licensing nor certification were required, neither was inspection.
      So, tell me, who is to know if an owner removed 200 or 400, or 2,000 sq ft of material? Hefty bags delivered to the dump all look the same. If paranoid, divide the mass between multiple trips to the dump.

      It's all about the money. Money for certification authority, inspection authorities, bond agents, insurer underwriters, et al.

      One is more exposed to fibrous filaments from the screen on your clothes drier.

      BTW: licensing offers no, none, protection from a shoddy homebuilder.

      Delete

You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.

Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.

If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.

If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.