Roberta X says we should not debate the antis because that gives them practice debating, thus improving their debating skills.
Instead, she suggests we cut them off at the knees and ask Joe Huffman's "One Question."
"Can you demonstrate one time or place, throughout all history, where the average person was made safer by restricting access to handheld weapons?"
I will do so from now on. Joe is also the originator of the "Jews in the Attic" test.
26 September 2010
1 comment:
You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.
Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.
If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.
If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I'm okay with antis having better debating skills. I'm okay with actual debate.
ReplyDeleteI think our rights are worth that much. If we can't articulate our position in a real debate, then we haven't invested much time in learning about them.
The other aspect is there are dozens of people who haven't decided or hadn't thought of the issues for every dedicated anti we debate.
If we change 1 or even 2 of those people, then it is a net win for the pro-rights side.