Posts
BUT!
I remember us pledging to defend Ukraine back when we encouraged them to give up their nukes.
I also recall that everything was going OK when the corrupt leader of the Ukraine was a Russian mouthpiece.
It also seems to me that we got involved with Ukrainian politics and got that corrupt mouthpiece replaced with a different corrupt politician who was more beholden to the Delaware Crime Family.
That appears to have triggered Russia a great deal and has led them to test the waters by annexing Crimea, waiting to see if the world would do anything, then going for the rest of the place.
That they did it when the Delaware Crime Family was in office was shitty timing for Russia.
No corrupt leader beholden to them in office, no carefully laundered foreign aid gets filtered back to "The Big Guy."
I think that is the crux of the matter.
Nothing I've read makes me think I want either side to win; but rather that it'd be best if they both, as nations, lost.
It'd really be best if it'd never started and all the innocent people caught up in it were spared.
But the innocent never do seem to avoid it, do they?
No comments:
Post a Comment
You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.
Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.
If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.
If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.