.38 Super v .45 ACP.
What I gave here was a comparison of ball ammunition.
Who carries that anymore?
In GURPS terms for hollowpoints you up the damage type one step and add an armor divisor of 0.5.
So the .38 Super damage changes from 3d-1 pi to 3d-1(0.5) pi+.
.45 ACP changes from 2d pi+ to 2d(0.5) pi++
As I mentioned before pi+ increases damage that makes it through the armor by 50%, pi++ doubles it.
With an armor divisor of 0.5, they aren't punching much armor. 0.5 DOUBLES the DR of the armor and gives a DR of 1 against unarmored targets.
Average die rolls (3.5 per die) against someone in a t-shirt:
.38 Super lands 9 points raw, -1 for the "bonus" DR, so 8 penetrates plus 50% so 12 points of damage. That's a major wound and a HT to remain conscious for the average person.
.45 ACP lands 7 points raw, -1 for the DR, 6 penetrates doubled gives 12...
Again they're nearly identical.
Neither will make it through that DR 6 vest on average, but the 38 Super has a chance. Since that DR is doubled I need a roll of 13 damage or more to do any to the target. Since the range of damage is 2-17, there's at least a chance of penetration. Best roll, five will penetrate and be upped to 7 points of damage to the target.
What about 9mm you ask?
2d+2 pi becomes 2d+2(0.5) pi+. 9 on average, 8 gets through, 12. Same situation as 38 Super with the armor. Spread of 4-14...
I suppose I should be fair and add .40 S&W to the discussion.
.40 is 2d+2 pi+ for ball. Unarmored target, average roll: 9, upped to 13 (I'm spotting a trend in handgun stopping power...)
Our DR 6 target: 9, 3 penetrates, 4 done.
Hollow points; 2d+2(0.5) pi++: 9, becomes 8, upped to 16!
Against DR 6, no penetration on average. Range of 4-14, up to two could penetrate so there's a very small chance of getting 4 to the target.
Here's another view... I'm often fascinated that a simple role playing game compares favorably with real world data. Pic snagged from here:
By viewing this blog the user is explicitly holding the author or authors harmless of any defamation, libel or slander. Further they agree that they have travelled to the state of Florida and are subject to Florida laws and codes alone and hold that no law of the other 49 states or any county or municipal subdivision apply.
Viewing or use of this blog or any contents or links contained herein by any person or entity within the confines of the states of Arizona and/or Tennessee is prohibited . Violators of this policy agree to hold the owner of this blog, its contents and all links contained herein, harmless to any harm or offense taken or perceived.
Permission to use any content on this site is explicitly denied to Robert Farago, his family, his friends, his associates, his pets, and his employees and/or employer and/or their employees either in part or whole.
Permission to use any content on this site is explicitly denied to Kevin Richard Bartmess, his family, his friends, his associates, his pets, and his employees and/or employer and/or their employees either in part or whole. Use of this content or replication of any content found within, including links, renders violators of this policy subject to a charge of $16,000 (US) payable on demand.