Posts
Sebastian posted about it and encouraged us to write. So I stole someone named J's comment and added some text of my own. Walla!
With regards to the ATF Question of the month posted here:http://www.atf.gov/firearms/industry/
I completely disagree with the inclusion of any new language pertaining to the restriction of any type of ammunition commonly used for sporting purposes. The regulations in question are onerous enough as is.
The law in question was never intended to be applied to rifle ammunition that is adapted to "handgun" use later.
Further, said ammunition is not a problem in the real world with regards to officer safety; this is a purely speculative move on the presumption that someone, somewhere, someday MIGHT use such ammunition unlawfully.
Literally attempting to fix something that is not broken by breaking it.
Signed,Angus McThag
Bet it has zero effect on what they do, but we have to try.
No comments:
Post a Comment
You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.
Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.
If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.
If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.