07 March 2014

Inflexible

Shotguns are often touted for their flexibility.

You can tailor your shot size to the flimsiness of the target.

You can get an ersatz rifle by using slugs.

Rifled slugs make it better than a Charleville Musket, but that's an improvement in sectional density and accuracy not trajectory.

The fallacy of this flexibility for the apoxyclips is that it's bought with specialized rounds.  You can carry dove and quail rounds for small birds, buck shot for larger animals, #4 shot for medium sized animals and slugs for when you need more range.  And every round of one type you carry precludes the carry of another type.  There's a degree of overlap with each round's effective envelope, luckily, but if you need the capabilities of one in particular and misjudged the number to bring...  You could be in the embarrassing situation of not being able to participate in a gun fight while still carrying ammo.

Plus, changing ammo mid stream can run afoul of your choke.  The best choke for a given load is bad for others and some slugs are not safe with some of the tighter chokes.

Shotguns really are specialist weapons.  They were developed to fill a need and that was killing birds.  That's a handy capability, because birds are everywhere and they're nearly all edible and tasty.  Birds are also fragile, which means it doesn't take much to bring them down.  So a single hit from a small round lead ball will do the job.

Small, fast, mammals like rabbits and squirrels share some characteristics with birds and shotguns, again, are good at bagging them.

Part of the idea that a shotgun can be THE gun comes from frontier history.  Muzzle loading history.  The flexibility offered is more real here because you were making your load's composition every time you charged the gun.

Yet... the west was won with rifles.  Cartridge rifles.

Most of the development of non-fowling shotgun ammunition comes from banning hunting of larger species with rifles for one reason or another.  The shot spread that's such an advantage for taking birds on the wing becomes a liability when hunting a deer or hog.

Then there's the range...  I mentioned that a slug gun is an ersatz rifle.  That's because it's got a trajectory that makes .45-70 seem like a laser-flat shooter.  Look up rainbow trajectory to get the joke.  Shotguns are essentially pistol range guns.

Shotgun ammunition has the double whammy of being both bulky and heavy.  A 2-3/4" 12 gauge round weighs approximately twice as much as a .30-06 round.  A loaded 12ga shotgun with 8 rounds weighs the same as a Garand.  So I'd get twice as many shots (for a given weight), comparable damage (with slugs), far better range and much better accuracy.  The .30-06 gives up the shooting birds on the wing (not really, it's actually easier to shoot flying things with a rifle, you don't have to lead near as much; the reason we don't use rifles on flying ducks is because of Rule 4).

If we go for a given number of rounds instead of weight, then we've opened up the loadout to carry other stuff.  .30-06 is considered a fairly hefty round too, .30-30 is about 80% the weight and 7.62x39 64%; meaning either more shots or more stuff compared to a shotgun loadout.  Even better, the guns for the lighter rounds are themselves lighter!  Freeing up even more weight for other things.

More shots is a good thing if you're living off the land.  A rifle is suitable or any game that needs #4 or heavier shot to take.  More than a century of the .30-30 demonstrates that.  In fact, the efficiency of .30-30 is the reason that rifle hunting of deer is banned in many areas, the hoof rats were becoming endangered.  7.62x39mm is damn similar in performance to .30-30.

The law, over and over again, is why we don't use rifles on much of the game taken; not because a rifle is a bad choice.

It is one thing to be caught out and only have a single gun available.  It's a similar thing to only be able to afford one gun.

But I thought we were talking about being prepared in advance so being caught out (you know, unprepared?) isn't a factor.

See also: This and this.

6 comments:

  1. Ever played a game where you had different ammo types for different enemies, and have to switch them in a hurry when you get caught by surprise? Doing so with a shotgun never involves the thought "Oh boy, this is fantastic". Usually it's more along the lines of "CRAPCRAPCRAPFASTERFASTERFASTER ARGH I JUST RELOADED THE WRONG TYPE". Imagine that, except real life, and you have a pretty darn good argument for wanting one round that works well on everything. If you've ever run empty in said game, you'll also probably want bigger magazines with lighter ammo in them so you can carry even more.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think a shotgun is a very useful toy to have, but you're absolutely right. There's very little you couldn't do with that .30-06 that you could do with a shotgun. Maybe nothing you couldn't do with that .30-06...? The ballistics of a .308 and a .30-06 are almost identical. Going to .308 gives you semiautomatics that won't make your thumb into bad meatloaf.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Semi-automatics with 12 more shots than the M1 with just as strong a combat pedigree. Such as an FAL or M1A? Of course they are all much more expensive than a bolt gun.

      Delete
    2. That, of course, is the problem. My used Remington 700 with scope cost less than half of what a low end .308 semiauto costs, and a third of a good Springfield M1A.

      It's always tradeoffs, right?

      Delete
  3. Keeping a gauge up, fed, and running is harder than a lot of once-a-quarter shooters realize. How many people have topped up a mag tube from a sidesaddle or shell caddy while running? How many have cleared a double feed or failure to eject on the clock?

    I like shooting the gauge. Rolling thunder drills are fun and challenging. If someone were kicking in the front door of my house right now, I'd still grab the M4gery.


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Woo hoo! I have an advantage because I can't run any more! Wait... Dammit!

      Keeping the thing fed and functioning for trap and field competitions was challenge enough back in the day and that's pretty sedate compared to 3-gun.

      Delete

You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.

Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.

If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.

If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.