Posts
I am getting sick of all the people on our side of the gun debate constantly coming up with new ideas to use in court against us.
Thankfully, it seems that what they've come up with is almost entirely theoretical still.
But the current round of speculation is about what training you've had and if your lawyer is being paid by some form of CCW insurance.
Because those things indicate "planning" to create a "self-defense" situation where you get to shoot someone.
Oh, and not getting training indicates gross irresponsibility and negligence.
There's no way out of the process as punishment.
Especially since it appears that the ccw insurers are essentially scams because of all the exit clauses built into the contract that lets them not pay for what you think you hired them to pay.
No comments:
Post a Comment
You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.
Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.
If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.
If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.