Posts
Comments
Saw this on Facebook:
But I do have more books than guns.
I think I have more books about guns than I have guns.
All it really means is I have a metric shit-ton of books.
There's nothing about having more books than guns that predicates having few guns.
You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.
Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.
If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.
If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.
The giuy is a self righteous asshat. He's the problem if he has a problem with now many guns or how many books a person has. It is none of his f-ing business. I have more books than guns, but it really is meaningless. Books are much cheaper than guns. Books take up less space than guns on average (about the same as handguns, a lot less than long guns). It's a stupid metric. It's the typical libtard "I'm smarter because I'm liberal" argument.
ReplyDeleteAnd here's the real reason he is full of $#!+. They have this thing called a LIBRARY. I can go check out any book they have and read it. I don't have to buy it. I don't really even have to get a library card if I'm willing to sit in the library and read books. I don't really have to pay much of anything to rent a book. Library cards are usually free, and like I said, I don't even necessarily need one. Reading books doesn't require that I buy range time or ammo.
He's comparing apples to oranges. And really he can just go F his self righteous self.
-swj