Posts
My old stats for the M900 were:
6dx34(2) pi++ inc; 6,000/18,000 - That's good for punching 518mm of RHA at 0°.
Gun Stats gives:
6dx33(2) pi+ inc; 8,140/26,700 for APFSDSDU. 503mm penetration.
6dx39(2) pi+ inc for long-rod APFSDSDU. 594mm penetration. "Long-Rod" is defined as a penetrator being 15 times longer than its diameter. The M900 penetrator is 25x603, 23 and change to 1. It's a long-rod.
A bit short of both benchmarks I found back in Feb '25. The round's performance is still classified (sorta) so there's not a lot of official information, but a great deal of "already leaked" information. War Thunder thinks 522mm.
But 6dx39 is in the ballpark of what I think it should do.
It's a game, so the important thing is the relative values come out about right even if the precise numbers don't quite. Gun Stats even has a section about how to use stated penetration values to determine damage.
Take the RHA penetration in mm * 0.787 / armor divisor and that gives dice. 6dx34 in the case of 522mm! But, like I said in Feb '25, I think it punches more, so I'm going with the long-rod numbers!
No comments:
Post a Comment
You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.
Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.
If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.
If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.