Via Weaponsman.
Chock full of all the minutia we gamer geeks debated at length.
15 November 2013
3 comments:
You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.
Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.
If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.
If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The testing and comparisons they did to the other swords of the period really drives home the GURPS "all TL6+ blades are automatically good quality" home. I think I've seen this program before, but never really paid proper attention to it.
ReplyDeleteGreat, now I need to track down a copy of Low Tech to see if they have all the different types of swords and their uses in there, among other things.
Learning how steel was made then and is made today really underlines how any sword made from TL6 on is "good". You almost have to set up your own shop and deliberately make the steel the old way to get any of it at all today.
ReplyDeleteYou can't buy bar stock with all those inclusions!
I know some people laugh at the beginning of Conan: The Barbarian where the Cimmerian smith is making a sword by pouring molten metal into vaguely sword shape mold. They did not make swords that way then, of course, but if they had a foundry that could heat iron hot enough to flow that well their steel would be EXCELLENT metal!
I'm actually 99% of the way to my engineering degree, so I know how good modern steel is. What they don't teach is just how BAD old steel was!
Delete