Posts
In the little tiff between Governor Newsome and President Trump about calling up the National Guard...
Not one mention of the National Guard being the militia.
Just like the pro-gun people have long maintained: The National Guard is just another grouping of the standing, Federal, Army with a special clause to allow the Governor to call them up for in-state use.
Also of note is the part of USC Trump cited in calling up the guard.
10 UCS § 12406.
Whenever—
(1)the United States, or any of the Commonwealths or possessions, is invaded or is in danger of invasion by a foreign nation;(2)there is a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States; orthe President may call into Federal service members and units of the National Guard of any State in such numbers as he considers necessary to repel the invasion, suppress the rebellion, or execute those laws. Orders for these purposes shall be issued through the governors of the States or, in the case of the District of Columbia, through the commanding general of the National Guard of the District of Columbia.
Our protestors should seriously consider finding some uniforms of the nation they are protesting for; because they're skating dangerously close to the definition of partisans and or espionage agents of a foreign power.
If they're getting paid or getting orders from another country, that makes them enemy agents of a foreign power and out of uniform so we can shoot them.
ReplyDeleteIf they're getting paid or getting orders from a non-governmental organization, that makes them terrorists in the act of terrorism so we can shoot them.
Anyone providing aid or support to the enemy combatants or terrorists are guilty of providing aid or support and we can arrest them and potentially shoot them.
It's that simple.
We could have done this years ago, but our leadership was either in cahoots with foreign powers or non governmental organizations or wanted the instability. But things have changed as our current president is probably the most anti-foreign power or ngo president we've had since... maybe Washington?