I think I figured out why some people regard a trust owning an NFA firearm as a loophole.
I can, indeed, add a
Technically, this person now owns an NFA item, right? Sort of. The trust owns the item, the trustee is a partner in owning the trust.
But nothing about adding this person to the trust allows them to actually possess the item because of their prohibited status!
I don't know if the actual ownership issue has been tested in court, nor do I want to be the first one to try. This is a contentious area for normal property let alone NFA items. IANAL, so if you want a definitive answer, retain one.
I am very cautious about who I would let be a trustee, if for no other reason a trustee could clean out the gun safe, sell everything for 25¢ on the dollar, blow that on hookers and blow and I'd have no recourse against them about the loss of my stuff. I made it our stuff by making them a trustee!
No comments:
Post a Comment
You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.
Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.
If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.
If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.