Most Youtube product reviews are for people who for one reason or another cannot or will not go to the manufacturer's web page and READ about the product.
Plus 90% of them would be better served just running an audio recording over a fixed image. A still life they reach into to pat the product lovingly from time to time while they drone on and on and on and on and on and on... doesn't justify making a video. What they're making is a podcast that takes up a lot of space on their hard drive.
30 November 2014
1 comment:
You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.
Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.
If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.
If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I still want to start up a series of gun/gear video reviews when I have regular access to a decent range that I can use to do so. High Speed Reviews, 30 seconds to 2 minutes, demonstrating all possible relevant features in that time with the combined powers of Shouting and Not Wasting Time. A TL;DR of a review video, since nobody seems to make any these days that aren't far, FAR longer than they need to be (review things like on Forgotten Weapons of odd, unique historical guns get a pass, because going into depth on their oddity is the cool part)
ReplyDelete