25 July 2018

That Fighting Knife

The US Army developed the M3 fighting knife in 1943 because they felt the troops needed a combat knife.

The M4, M5, M6 and M7 bayonets are simply M3 fighting knives with attachments for their respective guns.

The troops broke them by the case-load.

Why?

Because the troops also needed utility knives.

The USMC acknowledged this by issuing the Ka-Bar.  It's kind of a mid-point between a utility and fighting knife.

The M9 bayonet appears to have dropped all pretense of being a fighting knife in favor of utility functions, even to the point of compromising its functionality as a fighting bayonet.  It's function as a pointy thing on the end of a rifle to prod prisoners is uncompromised.

The USMC OKC-3S is more optimized for fighting.  Kind of the philosophy of the ka-bar applied to a bayonet.  Good as a fighting knife, good as a fighting bayonet, good for utility.  That it was best at some of the categories is a plus, but not part of the goals.

I don't know if the Ka-bar is still issued alongside the bayonet or not.  I know I've seen lots of pictures of Jarheads toting both.

1 comment:

  1. I was not issued a bayonet by virtue of having a -203. But I carried a USMC marked Ka-Bar that my Jarhead cousin took with him when he was a FAC for 1st Mar Div in 2003.

    ReplyDelete

You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.

Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.

If you're trying to comment anonymously: Sign your work. Try this link for an explanation: https://mcthag.blogspot.com/2023/04/lots-of-new-readers.html

Anonymous comments must pass a higher bar than others. Repeat offenders must pass an even higher bar.

If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.